Skip to main content

Dendritic allometry of neocortical pyramidal neurons across mammalian brain size

Journal
Brain structure & function (Q1)
Published
5 November 2026
Study design
Unclassified
Evidence level
Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
Authors
Young-Jin Jang, Dongchoon Ahn
PMID
42986468
DOI
10.1007/s00429-026-03227-0

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Histology (top studies of the week, 8 November 2026): Quantitative neuronal morphology links dendritic structure with brain size

Abstract

Neuron number increases with mammalian brain size, but how the dendritic morphology of individual neocortical pyramidal neurons changes across this range remains unclear. To address this question, we examined 2,412 neocortical pyramidal neuron reconstructions from 23 mammalian species in NeuroMorpho.Org, spanning an approximately 11,000-fold range in brain weight. At the whole-neuron level, primary axis length, lateral extent, and Sholl critical radius increased with brain size but remained far below the isometric expectation, whereas total dendritic length showed no significant association. Mean remote bifurcation angle, section tortuosity, and maximum branch order decreased with brain size, suggesting that greater spatial reach was accompanied by a more streamlined arbor organization rather than by proportional increases in dendritic cable length or branching depth. Compartment-resolved analyses localized much of the spatial, cable-length, and fixed-radius Sholl signal to basal dendrites, whereas apical spatial expansion was weaker. By contrast, branch geometry associations were broadly similar between apical and basal compartments. Together, these patterns suggest that mammalian pyramidal neuron morphology varies with brain size through selective spatial expansion and basal-dominant compartmental scaling rather than through uniform enlargement of individual arbors.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.