Preparing for responsive management versus renal dialysis in older people living with kidney failure and frailty or multimorbidity in the UK (Prepare for Kidney Care): a two-arm, superiority, parallel-group, open-label, pragmatic, phase 3, individually randomised controlled trial
- Journal
- Lancet (London, England) (Q1)
- Published
- 4 November 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Caskey FJ, Worthington J, Liu Y, MacNeill SJ, Rooshenas L, Garfield K, et al.
- PMID
- 42982076
- DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(26)01818-0
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Nephrology (paper of the day, 6 November 2026): Pragmatic RCT comparing conservative care vs dialysis in frail elders
- Picked for Internal Medicine (paper of the day, 6 November 2026): Pragmatic RCT comparing conservative vs dialysis in frail elderly
- Picked for Family Practice (paper of the day, 6 November 2026): Conservative vs dialysis management in frail older CKD
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of conservative kidney management and dialysis in older people (aged ≥80 years regardless of frailty and comorbidity or aged 65-79 years if frailty or multimorbidity are present) living with kidney failure is unknown. We aimed to assess the relative effectiveness of preparing for responsive management-a protocolised version of conservative kidney management-and preparing for renal dialysis. METHODS: Prepare for Kidney Care was a two-arm, superiority, parallel-group, open-label, pragmatic, phase 3, individually randomised controlled trial conducted in 31 kidney centres in England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. Eligible patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 15 mL/min per 1·73 m2, confirmed by at least one additional reading in the 12 months preceding consent that was not due to acute kidney injury, and were either aged 80 years or older, or aged 65-79 years with a WHO performance status of at least 3 or a Davies comorbidity score of at least 2. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to prepare for responsive management-a patient-centred approach focused on slowing disease progression, active symptom management, and preserving quality of life without the use of dialysis or kidney transplantation-or to prepare for renal dialysis. Randomisation was stratified by centre and minimised by age; a centralised system ensured allocation concealment until randomisation had taken place. The primary outcome was the mean difference in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), combining length and health-related quality of life from the patient-reported EQ-5D-5L scale, including all follow-up from randomisation to Aug 31, 2025. The primary outcome was analysed by intention to treat in the full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned participants, with missing EQ-5D-5L values for living participants imputed. Harms (hospital admissions and dialysis access complications) and adverse events (deaths and hospital admissions, by cause) were assessed in the full analysis set. The trial was registered with ISRCTN, 17133653 (completed). FINDINGS: From July 1, 2017, to Aug 31, 2024, 6120 patients were screened across 31 kidney centres in the UK, 445 (7%) of whom were eligible and agreed to be randomly assigned. 228 (51%) of 445 participants were randomly assigned to prepare for responsive management and 217 (49%) of 445 participants were randomly assigned to prepare for renal dialysis. Median age was 82 years (IQR 80 to 86) and 137 (31%) of 445 participants were female. After a mean follow-up duration of 4·5 years (SD 2·1), mean QALYs were 1·354 (95% CI 1·201 to 1·508) in the prepare for responsive management group and 1·472 (1·288 to 1·655) in the prepare for renal dialysis group (adjusted mean difference -0·147 [95% CI -0·350 to 0·056] p=0·16). Specific harms outcomes were not prespecified, but hospital admission rates were similar in the two groups and dialysis access complications were significantly lower in the prepare for responsive management group (adjusted incident rate ratio 0·41 [95% CI 0·19 to 0·88]), based on 74 events in 36 participants across both groups. There were 667 serious adverse events in the prepare for responsive management group (157 [69%] of 228 participants died, with 510 hospital admissions) and 578 in the prepare for renal dialysis group (136 [63%] of 217 participants died, with 442 hospital admissions). None of these serious adverse events met the criteria for expedited reporting. INTERPRETATION: Among older people living with kidney failure and frailty or multimorbidity, we found no evidence that either preparing for responsive management or preparing for renal dialysis was superior in terms of QALYs over a mean follow-up duration of 4·5 years. This trial provides novel comparative information for clinical decision making. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.