Skip to main content

Visual Perceptual Learning Based on Adaptive Contrast Detection Training Enhances Vision and Contrast Sensitivity in Diabetic Retinopathy

In brief

Home vision training improved acuity by 0.10 logMAR in diabetic retinopathy

In a small randomized study, 12 patients who completed three months of home training improved visual acuity from 0.36 to 0.26 logMAR; grating acuity, motion contrast sensitivity, and vision-related quality of life also improved. Retinal blood-vessel imaging stayed stable, and eight of 36 randomized patients did not complete the study, so larger trials must confirm the benefit.

Journal
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science (Q1)
Published
2 November 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Kexin Cao, Sha Luo, Xiaotong Xiang, Qitao Zhao, Wenxiao Ma, Lixia Feng
PMID
42975101
DOI
10.1167/iovs.67.13.9

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Ophthalmology (paper of the day, 4 November 2026): Randomized study tests visual rehabilitation in diabetic retinopathy

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of home-based visual perceptual learning (VPL) on visual function and explore the residual visual plasticity in diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: Thirty-six DR patients following routine therapies were randomized (1:1). Twenty-eight completed the study (VPL, n = 12; control, n = 16) after excluding eight for poor adherence or incomplete follow-up. The VPL group underwent 3-month home-based grating detection training at individual cutoff spatial frequencies. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), grating acuity (GA), contrast sensitivity to first-order motion stimuli (1stM), optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and Low Vision Quality-of-Life (LVQOL) questionnaire were assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months for the VPL group and at baseline and 3 months for the control group. RESULTS: BCVA improved from 0.36 to 0.26 logMAR (P = 0.003), GA improved from 12.42 to 17.47 cycles per degree (2.96 dB) and 1stM increased from 64.26 to 83.42 (2.27 dB) in the VPL group. A significant group × time interaction was found for GA (F1, 26 = 63.595, P < 0.001, \( \eta_{p}^2 \) = 0.710), 1stM (F1, 26 = 32.663, P < 0.001, \( \eta_{p}^2 \) = 0.557), and BCVA (F1, 26 = 10.872, P = 0.003, \( \eta_{p}^2 \) = 0.295). The LVQOL score increased (+4.33; P < 0.001) and correlated with ΔGA (r = 0.671, P = 0.017). OCTA parameters remained stable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results reveal significant plasticity in the visual system in DR and suggest that contrast detection training may extend to motion perception tasks. Our study provides additional support for VPL as a potential treatment for DR.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.