Skip to main content

Benchmarking intermediate dose spillage in single target stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases

Journal
Physics and imaging in radiation oncology (Q1)
Published
9 October 2026
Study design
Unclassified
Evidence level
Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
Authors
Youness Nour, Shari Wiegreffe, Tuba Tekin, Lara Caglayan, Christina Leitzen, Cas S Dejonckheere, et al.
PMID
42904134
DOI
10.1016/j.phro.2026.101105

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Medical Physics (top studies of the week, 25 October 2026): SRS plan-quality benchmark with clinical replanning and dosimetric outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intermediate-dose spillage is central to normal-brain sparing in stereotactic radiosurgery, yet fixed adverse-event and relative indices do not define achievable plan quality for single-target linear accelerator treatments. The aim was to derive a volume-dependent absolute benchmark for the 50% prescription isodose volume (V50%; equivalent to V10 Gy for 20 Gy plans) for brain metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 276 single-isocenter single-target plans were analyzed: 178 idealized model plans and 98 clinical plans. Power-law regression in log-log space modeled spillage against planning target volume (PTV, cm3). The volume-scaling exponents were 0.83 for the ideal references and 0.75 for the simplified clinical threshold. The clinical upper threshold was derived using q = 0.90 quantile regression. Threshold-exceeding plans were reviewed for anatomical or technical justification. RESULTS: In the model cohort V50% value correlated strongly with PTV (r = 0.994, p < 0.001). The ideal mean model was V50% = 3.71 × PTV0.83, the conservative ideal-planning reference was V50% = 4.10 × PTV0.83, and the clinical upper threshold was V50% = 5.00 × PTV0.75. Ten of 98 clinical plans (10%) exceeded the threshold. Seven lacked anatomical justification and were replanned, reducing V50% by a median of 14% (range 7-29%) without compromising target coverage. CONCLUSIONS: A volume-based V50% benchmark provided a complementary quality-assurance reference for single-target linear accelerator radiosurgery for brain metastases. It flagged plans that warranted structured review alongside target coverage, organs of interest, conformity, and gradient metrics.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.