Functional personalization in digital manufacturing: a translational framework for patient-specific implants, arthroscopic locators, and therapeutic constructs
- Journal
- Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology (Q1)
- Published
- 28 September 2026
- Study design
- Unclassified
- Evidence level
- Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
- Authors
- Qun Li, Yi-Han Yang, Jin-Wei Chu, Xu-Yang Wang, Song-Ying Du, Hong-Gang Zhu, et al.
- PMID
- 42865543
- DOI
- 10.3389/fbioe.2026.1903071
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Histology (top studies of the week, 18 October 2026): Framework for patient‑specific digital manufacturing and implants
Abstract
Three-dimensional printing and digital manufacturing are increasingly used to produce patient-specific implants, surgical guides, arthroscopic locators, and therapeutic constructs. Yet the field is often described through a device-centered lens, emphasizing anatomical customization, printing accuracy, and material feasibility. This framing is becoming insufficient. Patient-specific manufacturing should not be understood merely as the fabrication of individualized objects, but as a clinically executable workflow that translates imaging data into surgical action, regenerative therapy, and outcome-informed iteration. This Perspective proposes that the next stage of 3D printing in medicine depends on three conceptual shifts: from anatomical matching to functional and procedural optimization; from passive printed products to interfaces that carry digital planning into the operating room; and from isolated fabrication success to clinically validated, regulation-aware, and feedback-driven manufacturing systems. Orthopedic applications are used as a representative context, with particular attention to 3D-printed arthroscopic locators for knee arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. This example illustrates how patient-specific design can move beyond open reconstruction into minimally invasive procedures, where accurate localization, reproducibility, and workflow compatibility are central. We further discuss therapeutic constructs, artificial intelligence, digital twins, point-of-care manufacturing, and translational barriers. Rather than offering another broad review of 3D printing applications, this Perspective proposes a framework for defining success in patient-specific digital manufacturing as the reliable conversion of patient data into safe, reproducible, and clinically meaningful intervention.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.