Skip to main content

Can acupuncture improve cardiac function in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis

In brief

Acupuncture was linked to a 4-point higher ejection fraction after PCI

In a meta-analysis of eight trials involving 759 patients, acupuncture was associated with a 4.26-percentage-point higher left ventricular ejection fraction and fewer major cardiovascular events after PCI. The findings also included better walking distance, but the small number and limited quality of studies mean larger, more rigorous trials are needed to confirm whether these benefits hold up.

Journal
Frontiers in medicine (Q1)
Published
9 September 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Zhihong Chen, Jinna Nie, Jiangshan Tian
PMID
42780566
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2026.1926216

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Biochemistry (medical) (top studies of the week, 27 September 2026): Acupuncture after PCI, clinical trial without metabolic assays
  • Picked for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (top studies of the week, 27 September 2026): Meta‑analysis, acupuncture improves cardiac function post‑PCI

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the effects of acupuncture in improving cardiac function and the reported adverse events in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through meta-analysis. METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Medical, China Biomedical Literature Database, VIP Database, Embase, Ovid Medline, Sinomed Database and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 2026. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1), and meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.3. The evidence was appraised per the GRADE framework. RESULTS: A total of 8 RCTs involving 759 patients were included, with 379 patients in the acupuncture group (247 males and 132 females) and 380 in the control group (conventional treatment or sham acupuncture; 257 males and 123 females). The results of the meta-analysis showed that, revealing that acupuncture was associated with better outcomes than conventional treatment or sham acupuncture in several measures. Specifically, the intervention led to a substantial boost in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by an average of 4.26 percentage points [95% CI (1.21, 7.31), P = 0.006], while also enhancing functional capacity as evidenced by a 43.88-m improvement in the 6-minute walk distance [95% CI (10.40, 77.36), P = 0.01]. On the biochemical front, acupuncture demonstrated its efficacy by reducing serum creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) levels [SMD = -1.99, 95% CI (-3.46, -0.52), P = 0.008]. The treatment also showed favorable effects on cardiac remodeling, evidenced by decreased left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) by 2.56 mm [95% CI (-4.65, -0.46), P = 0.02] and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) by 1.36 mm [95% CI (-2.34, -0.37), P = 0.007]. Additionally, acupuncture was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by 60% [RR = 0.40, 95% CI (0.24, 0.66), P = 0.0005], positioning it as a promising adjunctive therapy for cardiovascular management. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that acupuncture may improve cardiac function in patients after PCI. However, the available literature is limited in both quantity and methodological quality. More rigorously designed, large-sample, high-quality RCTs are warranted to further validate these findings and provide more robust evidence for evidence-based practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: identifier CRD420261410954.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.