Skip to main content

Effectiveness and safety of tacrolimus versus infliximab as rescue therapy for intravenous corticosteroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis: a multicenter cohort study

Journal
Journal of Crohn's & colitis (Q1)
Published
3 September 2026
Study design
Retrospective cohort
Evidence level
Level 3, Low (CEBM 3b)
Authors
Takahito Katano, Shinji Okabayashi, Hajime Yamazaki, Mao Matsubayashi, Kanade Serizawa, Masatoshi Nakashima, et al.
PMID
42768925
DOI
10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjag143

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Gastroenterology (paper of the day, 25 September 2026): Tacrolimus vs infliximab rescue therapy for severe ulcerative colitis

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) refractory to intravenous corticosteroids (IVCS) is a major clinical challenge with limited rescue therapy options. Although tacrolimus has been proposed as a potential rescue therapy, its effectiveness and safety compared with infliximab, widely used in this setting, remain unclear. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted across 34 Japanese institutions, including hospitalized patients with IVCS-refractory ASUC who received infliximab or tacrolimus as rescue therapy between January 2014 and March 2023. The primary outcome was clinical remission at day 14, using two-item patient-reported outcome scoring. Secondary outcomes included clinical response at day 3 and 7, colectomy, and adverse events within 56 days. A modified Poisson regression model was used for analysis. RESULTS: Among 300 patients (infliximab, n = 113; tacrolimus, n = 187), clinical remission at day 14 occurred in 41.6% and 33.7%, respectively, with no difference (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 0.87 [95% CI: 0.65, 1.17]). Clinical response at day 3 was lower with tacrolimus (infliximab 42.5% vs tacrolimus 24.1%; adjusted RR 0.58 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.80]) but did not differ at day 7 (infliximab 63.7% vs tacrolimus 51.9%; adjusted RR 0.83 [95% CI: 0.69, 1.01]). No difference in colectomy within 56 days was observed, although rates were higher in the tacrolimus (13.3% vs 20.3%; adjusted RR 1.58 [95% CI: 0.93, 2.67]). Adverse events were similar between groups (infliximab 8.8% vs tacrolimus 7.5%; adjusted RR 0.77 [95% CI: 0.37, 1.57]). CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus demonstrated comparable effectiveness and safety to infliximab as rescue therapy for IVCS-refractory ASUC, although early response was slower.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.