Cefoxitin versus cefotaxime as empirical treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in liver cirrhotic patients: randomized controlled clinical trial

Why clinicians should know about it

• Picked for Microbiology (medical) (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Cefoxitin vs cefotaxime SBP trial, not microbiology diagnostics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a severe complication of cirrhosis requiring immediate empirical antibiotic therapy. Third-generation cephalosporins are the traditional agents of choice; however, increasing clinical failure rates necessitate the evaluation of alternative antibiotics to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes. The aim was to investigate the efficacy of cefoxitin versus cefotaxime for SBP treatment. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 140 cirrhotic patients with community-acquired SBP at Al-Rajhy Liver University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt. Patients were randomized to receive either cefotaxime (n = 70) or cefoxitin (n = 70), 2 g every 8 h for 5 days. Polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) counts were measured upon admission, on Day 2 and on Day 5. Clinical response rates at Days 2 and 5, development of hepatorenal syndrome, length of stay and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: According to intention-to-treat analysis, clinical response rates at Day 2 were 74.2% in the cefotaxime group and 80% in the cefoxitin group, while at Day 5, they were 71.4% and 74.3%, respectively (P = 0.704). The PMN counts at Days 0, 2 and 5 showed no significant differences between the cefotaxime and cefoxitin groups (P = 0.889, 0.909 and 0.360, respectively). The incidence of hepatorenal syndrome was 7.1% in the cefotaxime group compared with 8.6% in the cefoxitin group (P = 0.753), and mortality was 15.7% and 12.9%, respectively (P = 0.629). CONCLUSIONS: Cefoxitin showed comparable effectiveness to cefotaxime but may be utilized in selected clinically stable SBP patients.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.