Molecular groups predict response to fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and metanalysis
- Journal
- Gynecologic oncology (Q1)
- Published
- 4 September 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review of cohort studies
- Evidence level
- Level 4, Very Low (CEBM 4)
- Authors
- Antonio Raffone, Daniele Neola, Angelica Tranchini, Maria Mele, Davide Vinci, Enrico Pazzaglia, et al.
- PMID
- 42697027
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.08.021
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Obstetrics and Gynecology (paper of the day, 9 September 2026): Molecular groups predict fertility‑sparing EC response
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Molecular profiling has transformed endometrial carcinoma management, yet its value in predicting response to fertility-sparing conservative treatment remains undefined. OBJECTIVE: To provide pooled estimates of oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment in women with early-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC), stratified by molecular groups. DATA SOURCES AND SELECTION CRITERIA: Six electronic databases (MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to December 2025. Peer-reviewed studies providing extractable data on oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing treatment by molecular group in EEC women were included; literature reviews and case reports were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES: Rates of complete response (CR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), and recurrence were pooled within each molecular group using a random-effects model with Freeman-Tukey transformation; heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 index, and risk of bias with MINORS. RESULTS: Nine studies were included and the pooled population comprised 295 conservatively treated EEC women (POLE-mt n = 23; MMRd n = 46; p53-abn n = 14; NSMP n = 212). Pooled CR was 95% in POLE-mt, 82% in NSMP, 62% in MMRd, and 41% in p53-abn groups. Pooled PD was 2%, 3%, 14%, and 38%, respectively. Pooled recurrence was 27% (POLE-mt), 26% (NSMP), 41% (MMRd), and 41% (p53-abn). CONCLUSION: In EEC women undergoing fertility-sparing management, molecular profiling might predict treatment response, with POLE-mt showing the best outcomes, p53-abn the worst, and MMRd and NSMP intermediate. If confirmed in larger cohorts, molecular profiling could be integrated into the pre-treatment workup to guide counselling. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD420261322951.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.