Atorvastatin, Cardiovascular Events, and Disability-free Survival in Older Adults
In brief
Atorvastatin cuts major cardiovascular events by 30% in adults over 70
In nearly 10,000 community-dwelling adults over 70 without cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or dementia, atorvastatin reduced major cardiovascular events over a median 5.9 years: 10.9 versus 15.5 events per 1,000 person-years. It did not extend survival free of dementia or persistent disability, and some adverse events were more common with treatment.
- Journal
- The New England journal of medicine (Q1)
- Published
- 29 August 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Sophia Zoungas, Rory Wolfe, Chris Moran, Stephen J Nicholls, Geoffrey C Cloud, Christopher M Reid, et al.
- PMID
- 42670961
- DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa2607314
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Family Practice (top studies of the week, 11 October 2026): Large RCT primary prevention statin in older adults
- Picked for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (top studies of the week, 6 September 2026): Atorvastatin trial in older adults
- Picked for Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (top studies of the week, 6 September 2026): Large RCT primary prevention with statin in elderly
- Picked for Pediatric Surgery (top studies of the week, 6 September 2026): Recent Pediatric Surgery research from a high-quartile journal
- Picked for Radiation Oncology (top studies of the week, 6 September 2026): Ranked by evidence level and journal quartile
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and safety of statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events and the extension of disability-free survival among older adults remain uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial at general medical practices across Australia. Community-dwelling adults at least 70 years of age with no history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or dementia were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive atorvastatin at a dose of 40 mg once daily or identical placebo. The two primary end points were a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, or coronary revascularization (to assess effects on major cardiovascular events) and a composite of death from any cause, dementia, or persistent physical disability (to assess effects on disability-free survival). Analyses were performed according to a hierarchical testing plan. RESULTS: A total of 9971 participants were enrolled: 4984 were assigned to receive atorvastatin and 4987 to receive placebo. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 74.7±4.5 years, and 51.9% were women. After a median of 5.9 years, a primary cardiovascular event had occurred in 297 participants (10.9 events per 1000 person-years) in the atorvastatin group and in 412 participants (15.5 events per 1000 person-years) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.82; P<0.001). Death from any cause, dementia, or persistent physical disability occurred in 637 participants (21.6 events per 1000 person-years) in the atorvastatin group and in 676 participants (23.0 events per 1000 person-years) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.05; P = 0.25). Serious adverse events occurred in 131 participants (2.7%) in the atorvastatin group and in 129 (2.7%) in the placebo group, with musculoskeletal, hepatobiliary, and diabetes-related adverse events occurring more commonly in the atorvastatin group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with atorvastatin led to a lower risk of major cardiovascular events than placebo at a median of 5.9 years but did not result in longer disability-free survival among community-dwelling older adults without clinical cardiovascular disease. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council and others; STAREE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02099123.).
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.