Skip to main content

Prospective multicenter evaluation of an easy-to-use DNA microarray for the detection of dermatophytes in clinical samples compared with conventional mycological methods

In brief

DNA microarray detects dermatophytes in 75% of samples, outpacing culture and microscopy

In a multicenter trial of 487 nail, skin and scalp specimens, the DendrisKIT DNA microarray identified dermatophytes in 367 cases (75%), compared with 63% by culture and 67% by direct examination. Adding the assay to conventional methods raised overall detection to about 81%, though culture remains needed for rare non-dermatophyte molds.

Journal
Microbiology spectrum (Q1)
Published
28 August 2026
Study design
Prospective / inception cohort
Evidence level
Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2b)
Authors
Hélène Guegan, Geneviève Cremer, Françoise Foulet, Françoise Botterel, Arnaud Jabet, Frédérique Boquel, et al.
PMID
42663453
DOI
10.1128/spectrum.00567-26

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Microbiology (medical) (paper of the day, 2 September 2026): DNA microarray rapidly detects dermatophytes in clinical samples

Abstract

Molecular methods are increasingly used for the diagnosis of superficial fungal infections, providing rapid and sensitive detection of dermatophytes. This multicenter study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the DendrisKIT (DP assay), an automated DNA microarray for dermatophyte detection, compared with conventional mycological methods. In total, 490 clinical samples from four French centers were analyzed using the DP assay, direct examination (DE), and fungal culture. After excluding invalid results, 487 samples (316 nail samples, 145 skin scrapings, 26 scalp samples) were included. Discrepant results were further investigated using an alternative commercial molecular assay. The DP assay detected dermatophytes in 367/487 samples (75.4%), outperforming DE (67.4%) and culture (63.4%). Compared with culture, the DP assay showed that the sensitivity to culture was 96.4% [94.3-98.5], while the specificity was 61.2% [54.0-68.4], reflecting additional detections rather than false positives. Among culture-negative/DP assay-positive samples, 58 were considered probable true positives, leading to an adjusted specificity of 90.8% [95%CI: 85.6-96.0]. Eleven culture-positive/DP-negative cases were observed, likely due to heterogeneous fungal distribution within the sample. The highest detection rates were achieved by combining the DP assay with DE or culture (80.9% and 77.6%, respectively). The DP assay is a reliable, easy-to-use, rapid, and high-throughput method for dermatophyte detection. When used with conventional mycological methods, it improves diagnostic yield and reduces turnaround time, but culture remains essential for identifying rare fungi causing superficial fungal infections but not included in the panel, such as non-dermatophyte molds.IMPORTANCECommercial multiplex assays improve dermatophyte detection in clinical samples, but their use is limited by poor standardization and accreditation constraints. DNA microarray technology expands pathogen detection and offers a promising alternative to multiplex real-time PCR. Here, we evaluated the DendrisKIT DP DNA microarray in a large multicenter cohort, showing improved diagnostic yield and shorter turnaround times, while culture remains essential for detecting rare fungi, including non-dermatophyte molds not covered by the panel.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.