Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation with Intermediate Stroke Risk
- Journal
- The New England journal of medicine (Q1)
- Published
- 28 August 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Daehoon Kim, Young Soo Lee, Jaemin Shim, Hee Tae Yu, Junbeom Park, Jin-Kyu Park, et al.
- PMID
- 42663303
- DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa2607978
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (top studies of the week, 30 August 2026): ICD implantation study, not bariatric surgery
- Picked for Breast and Endocrine Surgery (top studies of the week, 30 August 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current U.S. and European guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation as a class IIa indication in patients with atrial fibrillation at intermediate risk for stroke; however, evidence from randomized trials is needed. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-masked superiority trial in South Korea involving patients with atrial fibrillation and an intermediate risk of stroke (a score of 1 in men and 2 in women on the CHA2DS2-VASc scale; range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy or no anticoagulation. The primary end point was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death from cardiovascular causes at 24 months. RESULTS: Of 1803 patients who underwent randomization, 902 were assigned to receive DOAC therapy and 901 were assigned to receive no anticoagulant therapy. The mean age of the patients was 60.4 years, and 23.7% were women. At 24 months, a primary end-point event had occurred in 4 patients (cumulative incidence, 0.5%) in the DOAC group and in 13 (cumulative incidence, 1.5%) in the no-anticoagulant group (difference, -1.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.0 to -0.1; P = 0.03; hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.94). Stroke occurred in 3 patients (cumulative incidence, 0.3%) in the DOAC group and in 10 (cumulative incidence, 1.1%) in the no-anticoagulant group. The incidence of systemic embolism and major bleeding appeared to be similar in the two trial groups, and no deaths from cardiovascular causes occurred in either group. Serious adverse events occurred in 80 patients (8.9%) in the DOAC group and in 84 (9.3%) in the no-anticoagulant group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with atrial fibrillation at intermediate risk for stroke, DOAC therapy led to a lower risk of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death from cardiovascular causes at 24 months than no anticoagulation. (Funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, South Korea, and others; SINGLE-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04437654.).
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.