Skip to main content

Acupuncture-based interventions for blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk-related outcomes in adults with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal
Frontiers in medicine (Q1)
Published
12 August 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Xiangwei Zhong, Chengdong Yu, Haoyan Guo
PMID
42656444
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2026.1888399

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

Blood pressure control remains difficult in many adults with hypertension, and safe non-pharmacological strategies that can support conventional care are clinically relevant. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated acupuncture-based interventions for blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk-related outcomes in adults with hypertension. Randomized studies were identified from major biomedical databases and trial registers from inception to 16 March 2026. The primary synthesis focused on penetrating acupuncture and electroacupuncture, while non-penetrating acupoint stimulation was examined in extended analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Sixteen study reports representing 15 independent randomized studies were included. For end-of-treatment office blood pressure, acupuncture-based interventions reduced systolic blood pressure (MD -6.63 mmHg, 95% CI: -11.41 to -1.84) but showed no clear effect on diastolic blood pressure (MD -0.07 mmHg, 95% CI: -9.54 to 9.39). Change-score analyses showed a significant reduction in office diastolic blood pressure (MD -3.97 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.26 to -0.68), while systolic change crossed the null. Ambulatory blood pressure evidence was sparse; 24-h ambulatory diastolic change favored acupuncture-based interventions. No confirmed acupuncture- or stimulation-related serious adverse event was clearly reported. Overall, acupuncture-based interventions may support blood pressure control, especially systolic office blood pressure and diastolic change outcomes.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.