Skip to main content

The effects of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) supplementation on fasting blood glucose and HbA1c: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal
Diabetes research and clinical practice (Q1)
Published
25 August 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Nazila Farrin, Ali Nikparast, Motahareh Yadegari, Asma Sohrabnavi, Sanaz Pourreza, Mohammad Hassan Sohouli, et al.
PMID
42641800
DOI
10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113529

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) may affect glycemic control, although findings from randomized trials remain inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated its effects on fasting blood glucose (FBG) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through August 12, 2026. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models. Subgroup, meta-regression, nonlinear dose-response, sensitivity, and publication-bias analyses were performed, and evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE. Eleven trials involving 667 participants were included. Across 15 effect estimates, Ashwagandha modestly reduced FBG compared with placebo (WMD, -3.09 mg/dL; 95% CI, -5.61 to -0.58), with substantial heterogeneity. The HbA1c estimate, based on three trials, was imprecise and inconclusive (WMD, -0.05%; 95% CI, -0.47 to 0.36). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested variation in FBG effects by intervention duration and dose, but did not establish an advantage for any duration or dose. Nonlinear analyses showed no association with dose or intervention duration. Certainty of evidence was very low for both outcomes. Ashwagandha may modestly reduce FBG, but substantial heterogeneity and very low certainty preclude clinical recommendations.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.