Skip to main content

The efficacy and safety of combined traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment for PCOS-related infertility: an umbrella meta-analysis

Journal
Frontiers in medicine (Q1)
Published
6 August 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Hongwen Li, Chao Sun, Qingchen Zhou, Guangzhong Du
PMID
42625854
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2026.1877844

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) commonly causes infertility in women of reproductive age. Integrated Chinese-Western medicine is used to improve reproductive outcomes and reduce adverse effects, but its reliability remains uncertain. METHODS: Efficacy and safety meta-analyses of integrated traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine for PCOS-related infertility were synthesized. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and the Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP) were searched from inception to November 2025. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessed quality and certainty. Outcomes were classified by significance and evidence strength. RESULTS: Twenty meta-analyses included 39 intervention types and 153 outcomes, 135 outcomes (36 interventions) favored integrated treatment, and 18 (13 interventions) were non-significant. Heterogeneity and publication bias affected 33 and 48.4%, respectively. AMSTAR scores were 4-9. Four outcomes from two interventions met Class I-III criteria. Chinese medicine plus Western medicine using the TCM Cycle Method showed Class I evidence for pregnancy rate (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 2.43, 3.13) and Class II evidence for total clinical efficiency (OR: 3.78, 95% CI: 3.29, 4.34) and ovulation rate (OR: 2.90, 95% CI: 2.39, 3.50). TCM cycle therapy plus ovulation induction showed Class III evidence for ovulation rate (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.14). GRADE ratings were high for 45, moderate for 92, and low for 16 outcomes. CONCLUSION: Integrated therapy showed promising associations, but robust evidence remains limited; only four of 153 outcomes met Class I-III criteria. Rigorous randomized trials are required. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251275827, Identifier: CRD420251275827.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.