The effects of progressive muscle relaxation on sleep quality in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
In brief
Progressive muscle relaxation improves sleep quality by over one standard deviation
A meta-analysis of 14 randomized trials (957 adults) found that progressive muscle relaxation lifted subjective sleep quality by more than one standard deviation overall, with similar gains in cancer patients and stronger effects in non-cancer participants. Benefits were clear in adults under 55 but not demonstrated in those 55 and older, and the number of sessions did not influence outcomes.
- Journal
- Frontiers in public health (Q1)
- Published
- 6 August 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Kehan Li, Shiwei Chen, Yixuan Liu, Nanding Yu
- PMID
- 42625730
- DOI
- 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1906525
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (paper of the day, 24 August 2026): Progressive muscle relaxation improves sleep quality meta‑analysis
- Picked for Oncology and Radiation Oncology (top studies of the week, 23 August 2026): Meta‑analysis of muscle relaxation for sleep, not oncology
- Picked for Pharmacology (medical) (top studies of the week, 23 August 2026): Progressive muscle relaxation meta‑analysis, non‑pharm
- Picked for Psychiatry and Mental Health (top studies of the week, 23 August 2026): Meta‑analysis of progressive muscle relaxation improving sleep quality
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the increasing number of people suffering from insomnia, sleep has evolved into a global public health issue. Compared to the side effects and instability of drug treatments, people are constantly seeking non-pharmacological treatments to improve sleep quality. Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) has gradually come into focus. Because existing evidence remains inconsistent, this study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: As of May 2026, studies related to progressive muscle relaxation and sleep quality were identified through searches of five databases, including CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Sleep quality outcomes were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis. analyses were conducted according to participant type (cancer patients and non-cancer patients) and age group (Age < 55 years and Age ≥55 years). Meta-regression was used to examine whether the number of progressive muscle relaxation sessions was associated with sleep quality. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment were performed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 957 participants were included in the final analysis. The pooled findings indicated that progressive muscle relaxation improved sleep quality (Hedges g = -1.24, 95% CI -1.71--0.77, p < 0.001, I 2 = 85.5%). Improvements were observed in both cancer patients (Hedges g = -1.17, 95% CI -2.24--0.09, I 2 = 86.8%) and non-cancer patients (Hedges g = -1.29, 95% CI -1.94--0.65, I 2 = 86.5%), with a larger effect observed among non-cancer patients. When participants were grouped by age, a significant benefit was found in adults younger than 55 years (Hedges g = -1.40, 95% CI -2.12--0.69, I 2 = 89.4%), whereas no significant improvement was detected among adults aged 55 years and older (Hedges g = -1.17, 95% CI -2.67-0.32, I 2 = 77.5%). Meta-regression did not identify a significant association between the number of progressive muscle relaxation sessions and sleep quality (p = 0.2106). CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence suggests that progressive muscle relaxation improves subjective sleep quality in adults. Beneficial effects were observed in both cancer and non-cancer populations, whereas the effects among older adults remain uncertain. Sleep quality improvements also do not appear to be related to the number of progressive muscle relaxation sessions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251267826, Identifier: CRD420251267826.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.