Improvement of soft tissue contrast and CT number accuracy in proton therapy CBCT with hardware-based scatter suppression: results from a prospective trial
- Journal
- International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics (Q1)
- Published
- 18 August 2026
- Study design
- Cohort / observational study
- Evidence level
- Level 4, Very Low (CEBM 4)
- Authors
- Uttam Pyakurel, Yawei Zhang, Ryan Sabounchi, Farhang Bayat, Junxiao Hu, Sébastien Brousmiche, et al.
- PMID
- 42612829
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2026.08.025
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Medical Physics (paper of the day, 19 August 2026): 2D antiscatter grid improves CBCT dosimetric accuracy
Abstract
PURPOSE: Adaptive proton therapy using cone beam CT (CBCT) requires accurate CT numbers for dose calculation and sufficient soft tissue visibility for reliable target and organ delineation. However, scatter in conventional CBCT causes substantial CT number inaccuracies and poor soft tissue contrast, limiting its use in adaptive workflows. To address this, a novel two-dimensional antiscatter grid (2D ASG) prototype and raw data correction algorithms were developed for a proton gantry-mounted CBCT system. This prospective study evaluated their impact on CBCT image quality in human subjects. METHODS: Ten patients undergoing proton therapy for prostate cancer were enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved imaging study. Each participant underwent two CBCT scans on a gantry-mounted proton therapy CBCT system: (1) standard CBCT with software-based scatter correction and (2) CBCT with the 2D ASG. Acquisition parameters and imaging dose were identical. Quantitative image quality metrics, including CT number error and artifact amplitude relative to planning CT, adipose-soft-tissue contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), peak signal-to-noise ratio (pSNR), and structural similarity index measure (SSIM), were calculated. Differences between configurations were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Compared with scatter-corrected clinical CBCT, the 2D ASG reduced median [min-max] soft tissue CT number errors from 169 [150-185] HU to 38 [26-54] HU (p = 0.002), indicating reduced scatter-induced artifacts. Median soft-tissue contrast increased from 62 [42-74] HU to 125 [97-144] HU (p = 0.002), and CNR improved from 0.99 [0.37-1.38] to 1.57 [1.28-1.75] (p = 0.002). SSIM relative to the planning CT increased from 0.53 [0.38-0.67] to 0.87 [0.85-0.93] (p = 0.002). Similar improvements were observed for pSNR and artifact amplitude. CONCLUSIONS: This first prospective evaluation of a prototype 2D ASG-equipped CBCT system for proton therapy demonstrated significant improvements in CT number accuracy and soft tissue visualization, supporting its potential role in adaptive proton therapy workflows.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.