Doxycycline Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
- Journal
- International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases (Q1)
- Published
- 18 August 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Shungo Yamamoto, Daisuke Onozuka, Takamasa Ishiuchi, Keiji Konishi, Satoshi Kutsuna
- PMID
- 42612786
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijid.2026.109053
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Microbiology (medical) (top studies of the week, 23 August 2026): Systematic review of doxycycline PEP for STIs
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (DoxyPEP) for preventing bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and determine, using trial sequential analysis (TSA), whether the accumulated evidence was sufficient to support reliable conclusions. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched four databases through July 29, 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DoxyPEP with standard care in men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) at high STI risk. Random-effects meta-analysis, RoB 2, and TSA were applied (OSF: z8ah6). RESULTS: Three RCTs involving 1,278 participants were included. DoxyPEP reduced any bacterial STI overall (pooled relative risk [RR] 0.41, 95% TSA-adjusted confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.85), chlamydia (RR 0.22, 95% TSA-adjusted CI 0.12-0.39), syphilis (RR 0.24, 95% TSA-adjusted CI 0.13-0.44), and gonorrhea (RR 0.79, 95% TSA-adjusted CI 0.66-0.95). Pathogen-specific analyses crossed monitoring boundaries and reached the required information size. The composite crossed the boundary but not its heterogeneity-adjusted required information size (1,278/1,696); heterogeneity was substantial (I²=89.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk MSM and TGW, DoxyPEP reduced chlamydia and syphilis, with a smaller gonorrhea benefit. TSA supported the direction of pathogen-specific effects, while the composite estimate and long-term antimicrobial resistance remained uncertain.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.