Focused Update to International Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Prolonged-Infusion Beta-Lactam Antibiotics Among Severely Ill Adult Patients: Endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists
In brief
Prolonged beta-lactam infusion cuts mortality by roughly 9% in critically ill adults
A Bayesian meta-analysis of 28 randomized trials found that continuous or extended beta-lactam infusion reduced death risk by about one tenth compared with standard short infusions, and 21 trials showed an 11% higher clinical cure rate. The evidence now reaches moderate certainty for survival benefit, but optimal dosing strategies and which patients gain the most remain unclear.
- Journal
- Pharmacotherapy (Q1)
- Published
- 1 September 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Lisa T Hong, Alireza FakhriRavari, Marta Ulldemolins, Jason A Roberts, Robert A Bonomo, Marc H Scheetz
- PMID
- 42598847
- DOI
- 10.1002/phar.70188
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Microbiology (medical) (top studies of the week, 16 August 2026): Guideline update on prolonged‑infusion beta‑lactams
- Picked for Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (paper of the day, 16 August 2026): Prolonged‑infusion beta‑lactams improve mortality
Abstract
In 2023, international consensus recommendations suggested the use of prolonged-infusion beta-lactam antibiotics over short-infusion dosing in severely ill adult patients to improve mortality or clinical cure, although the certainty of evidence was very low. With the availability of several new randomized controlled trials (RCTs), this focused update re-evaluates the efficacy of prolonged versus short infusion among severely ill adult patients. The original Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) question VII was separated into two questions addressing mortality (VIIa) and clinical cure (VIIb). Methods used for study identification, screening, and evidence grading were consistent with the original guideline, with the addition of Bayesian meta-analyses. A total of 28 RCTs evaluating mortality in severely ill adults were analyzed, with pooled estimates favoring prolonged infusion (RR 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 0.97), supported by Bayesian analyses demonstrating a 98.76% posterior probability of benefit. Across 21 RCTs evaluating clinical cure, prolonged infusion improved outcomes compared with short infusion (RR 1.11; 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.17), supported by Bayesian analyses demonstrating a 99.97% posterior probability of benefit. Certainty of evidence was strengthened to moderate for mortality and low for clinical cure. Consistent with the original recommendation (PICO X), subgroup analyses evaluating loading doses suggested improved outcomes when a loading dose is used before continuous infusion. Overall, the cumulative evidence reinforces and strengthens the recommendation for use of prolonged-infusion beta-lactam therapy in severely ill adult patients to improve survival and clinical cure. Continued use of loading doses when initiating continuous-infusion therapy is suggested. Future research should identify subpopulations most likely to benefit, clarify optimal prolonged-infusion strategies, and define the role of therapeutic drug monitoring.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.