Identification and management of sarcopenia in patients with multimorbidity: An EFIM critically appraised and adapted guideline
In brief
EFIM releases 37 tailored sarcopenia recommendations for multimorbid patients
The European Federation of Internal Medicine adapted existing sarcopenia guidelines into 37 practical recommendations-30 strong and 7 weak-for adults with multimorbidity, emphasizing routine case-finding, handgrip or chair-stand testing as the first assessment step, and individualized nutrition and exercise plans. While the guidance fills a clinical gap, most advice rests on low-to-moderate evidence, underscoring the need for more research in multimorbid populations.
- Journal
- European journal of internal medicine (Q1)
- Published
- 13 August 2026
- Study design
- Practice guideline / consensus
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1c)
- Authors
- M Bernabeu-Wittel, I Marín-León, C Angermann, P Cubo-Romano, Z Cvetković, A Dima, et al.
- PMID
- 42595648
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejim.2026.107121
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Internal Medicine (top studies of the week, 16 August 2026): EFIM-adapted sarcopenia guideline for multimorbid patients
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is highly prevalent among adults with multimorbidity and contributes substantially to frailty, disability, prolonged hospitalization, and mortality. International guidelines offer robust diagnostic and therapeutic frameworks for sarcopenia, but rarely incorporate the clinical complexity of patients with multimorbidity (MM). The European Federation of Internal Medicine (EFIM) undertook a guideline adaptation process to produce practical, evidence-based recommendations specifically tailored for internal medicine practice. METHODS: A multinational survey of European internists identified priorities and practice unsolved clinical questions (PICOs) in older people with MM. This was followed by a critical appraisal of updated existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and the selection of recommendations that were most applicable to specific clinical situations. Where direct evidence in multimorbid populations was limited, Good Practice Points were formulated considering pathophysiology, feasibility, and frailty safety concerns. RESULTS: A total of eight PICO questions were prioritized, covering case-finding, screening, diagnosis, prevention, iatrogenic complications, nutritional or exercise interventions, and pharmacotherapy. The 37 adapted recommendations from 4 high quality CPG emphasize: proactive case-finding in adults ≥65 years and multimorbid adults <65 years with specific risk factors; prioritization of muscle strength (handgrip or chair-stand) as the entry point to assessment; flexible diagnostic pathways, individualized multimodal physical activity, and nutritional interventions. The guideline also addresses treatment-induced risks (e.g., corticosteroids, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 /Gastric Inhibitory Peptide agonists) in MM contexts. Of the 37 selected recommendations (30 strong and 7 weak), 8 were based on high, 12 on moderate, and 17 on low-quality evidence, built on consensus (best practice statements). CONCLUSIONS: This EFIM-adapted clinical practice guideline provides a practical framework for the identification and management of sarcopenia in patients with MM. By integrating feasibility considerations, multimorbidity science, and functional assessment strategies, it offers a clinically relevant tool for improving outcomes in a population at high risk of frailty, disability, and mortality. Future research should prioritize MM populations to strengthen the evidence for integrated, patient-centered sarcopenia care.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.