Comparing safety and efficacy of primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass vs. one anastomosis gastric bypass: 6 months analysis of MBSAQIP database
- Journal
- Obesity surgery (Q1)
- Published
- 13 August 2026
- Study design
- Retrospective cohort
- Evidence level
- Level 4, Very Low (CEBM 4)
- Authors
- Adel Alhaj Saleh, Isabelle Van Roy, Caroline Sanicola, Edmund Lee, Amy Rosenbluth, Konstantinos Spaniolas
- PMID
- 42593619
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11695-026-08881-1
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (paper of the day, 17 August 2026): Primary OAGB vs SADI comparative outcomes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass (SADI) are increasingly performed hypoabsorptive bariatric procedures, yet large-scale comparative data remain limited. This study compared 30-day and 6-month outcomes between primary OAGB and SADI using a national bariatric registry. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the 2023 MBSAQIP database. Adult patients undergoing primary, non-revisional OAGB or SADI were included. Outcomes included 30-day and 6-month complications, percent total weight loss (%TWL), absolute weight loss, BMI change, and comorbidity resolution. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline differences. RESULTS: A total of 2,420 patients were included (OAGB n = 457; SADI n = 1,963), of whom 1,897 had complete 6-month weight data. On adjusted analysis, SADI was associated with lower odds of any 30-day complication (19.3% vs. 24.9%; OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95, p = 0.019), driven largely by lower rates of intravenous hydration (4.0% vs. 12.7%; OR 0.31, p < 0.001). Serious 30-day complications were rare and did not differ between groups. At 6 months, no significant differences were observed in any adverse outcome. OAGB was associated with comparable %TWL (23.4% vs. 22.2%; β - 0.94%, p = 0.042), with no significant differences in absolute weight loss or BMI change. OAGB demonstrated greater early resolution of hypertension (49.3% vs. 32.1%; OR 0.59, p = 0.003) and obstructive sleep apnea at 6 months (50.0% vs. 28.9%; OR 0.51, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both procedures demonstrate comparable safety profiles with rare serious complications. At 6 months, OAGB was associated with greater early resolution of hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea, though these findings are preliminary and require longer follow‑up. Safety profiles were comparable except for a higher readmission rate after SADI.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.