Reflectance confocal microscopy detects distinct features of field damage in chronically UV-irradiated SKH1 mouse skin
- Journal
- JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health (Q1)
- Published
- 22 June 2026
- Study design
- Unclassified
- Evidence level
- Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
- Authors
- Mehdi Boostani, Szabolcs Bozsányi, Sean P Murphy, Erin C Tracy, Ruby Acquah, John R Durkin, et al.
- PMID
- 42571230
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.xjidi.2026.100502
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Histology (paper of the day, 10 August 2026).
Abstract
UVR drives keratinocyte clonal expansion and cutaneous field damage, yet the assessment of early UV-induced field damage remains subjective and lacks an objective, non-invasive method. Reflectance confocal microscopy provides near-histologic imaging of the epidermis and may enable the detection of subclinical UV-induced changes before overt lesion development. Using SKH1 hairless mice, reflectance confocal microscopy images were analyzed during an early post-UV period at weeks 12 and 14 and a late post-UV period at weeks 16 and 18, corresponding to 6-8 and 2-4 weeks before the first visible tumor emergence, respectively. Five epidermal features significantly differentiated irradiated from control skin. Among the 5 features, atypical honeycombing and keratinocyte pleomorphism showed the strongest discriminatory value. In the early post-UV period, the expert-derived mean positivity for atypical honeycombing was 66.7-100% in irradiated skin versus 0-46.7% in control skin, while that for keratinocyte pleomorphism was 33.3-60% versus 0-13.3%, respectively. In the late post-UV period, atypical honeycombing was 46.7-100% in irradiated skin versus 0-33.3% in control skin, and keratinocyte pleomorphism was 33.3-80% versus 0-33.3%, respectively. Expert readers classified irradiated versus non-irradiated cases with 96.7% sensitivity and 90% specificity early and with 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity late. These findings support reflectance confocal microscopy as a non-invasive tool for detecting subclinical UV-related field damage.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.