Effects of postpartum hand expression on milk volume and breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
- Journal
- BMJ open (Q1)
- Published
- 6 August 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Weina Zhou, Liying Zhang
- PMID
- 42562584
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118868
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Pediatrics and Child Health (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
- Picked for Obstetrics and Gynecology (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026).
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hand expression is a manual method of milk expression that requires no equipment and is commonly used in the early postpartum period, particularly when direct breastfeeding is not possible or not effective. Randomised trials have reported mixed findings across different maternal-infant contexts. This review aims to synthesise randomised evidence on the effects of postpartum hand expression on expressed milk volume and breastfeeding outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will include individually randomised parallel-group controlled trials involving human postpartum women expressing breast milk in the early postpartum period. The intervention is postpartum hand expression; comparators will include electric or manual pump expression and usual care without structured hand-expression training. We will search PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CENTRAL from inception, without language or date restrictions and also search OpenGrey, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP, plus reference lists. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess risk of bias using the Risk of Bias tool for randomised trials, version 2. Eligible outcomes include expressed milk volume, breastfeeding outcomes, supplementation, time to onset of copious milk secretion and maternal outcomes. Where appropriate, we will conduct pairwise meta-analyses, calculating risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences or standardised mean differences for continuous outcomes with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity will be assessed using χ² and I², with prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Certainty of evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study will be based on previous research findings, so that ethics approval is not required. Data searching commences in June 2026 and expects to complete in January, 2027. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420261327070.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.