The effects of oral antioxidants on outcomes of assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Journal
- Frontiers in endocrinology (Q1)
- Published
- 22 July 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Ruonan Qiang, Zheyu Xu, Yingqiao Wang, Yuanye Gu, Yanfeng Liu, Qifan He, et al.
- PMID
- 42558317
- DOI
- 10.3389/fendo.2026.1891276
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Pharmacology (medical) (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026).
- Picked for Reproductive Medicine (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026).
- Picked for Obstetrics and Gynecology (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical efficacy of antioxidants in assisted reproductive technology (ART) remains inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of oral antioxidant supplementation on reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET). METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases from inception to February 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating oral antioxidants in patients undergoing ART. We performed meta-analyses by pooling effect sizes, conducting subgroup analyses, and exploring heterogeneity. Methodological quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias (RoB) tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessments were also conducted. RESULTS: This meta-analysis suggests that oral antioxidant supplementation may provide potential clinical benefits for women undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET. The pooled estimates indicated a significant improvement in the clinical pregnancy rate (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.070-1.554), the number of morphologically mature oocytes (MII oocytes) (MD = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.82-4.16), the number of high-quality embryos (MD = 1.08, 95%CI: 0.69-1.47), and the live birth rate (RR = 1.407, 95% CI: 1.052-1.881). Due to the limited number of included studies, further large-scale RCTs are required to confirm these findings regarding high-quality embryos, live birth rates, and miscarriage rates, thereby strengthening the overall level of evidence. CONCLUSION: Oral antioxidant supplementation as an adjuvant therapy shows potential clinical benefits in improving clinical pregnancy rates, MII oocyte yields, the number of high-quality embryos, and live birth rates in women undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET. Notably, antioxidants appear to offer broader clinical utility in patients undergoing the antagonist protocol. Given the current limitations in study volume and methodological heterogeneity, future well-designed RCTs-stratified by patient characteristics and employing standardized antioxidant regimens-are warranted. In particular, studies prioritizing live birth as the primary endpoint are essential to establish definitive clinical recommendations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: identifier CRD420251238213.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.