Effects of Five-Element Music Therapy on Chemotherapy Patients with Cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
In brief
Five-Element music therapy cuts anxiety scores by about 7 points in chemotherapy patients
A meta-analysis of 20 trials (1,588 patients) found that the therapy lowered anxiety by roughly 7 points, reduced depression by a similar margin, and improved sleep quality and overall quality of life. Effects on immune markers were also reported, but most evidence was low-certainty and derived mainly from Chinese studies, so broader applicability remains unproven.
- Journal
- Complementary therapies in medicine (Q1)
- Published
- 4 August 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Tao Sun, Ruping Zhao, Xishen Shan, Yuanzhe Zhu, Yaling Zhang, Yuling Zheng
- PMID
- 42551573
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ctim.2026.103411
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026).
- Picked for Physiology (medical) (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026).
- Picked for Family Practice (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026).
- Picked for Psychiatry and Mental Health (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026): Five‑Element music therapy for cancer patients
- Picked for Oncology and Radiation Oncology (top studies of the week, 9 August 2026): Music therapy improves anxiety, sleep, QoL in chemo patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically evaluate the effects of Five-Element Music Therapy (FEMT) on emotional state, sleep quality, and quality of life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS: We systematically searched 8 databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing FEMT with standard care or control music interventions. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 (ROB2) was used to assess the quality of included RCTs. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4, and sensitivity analysis was conducted with Stata 18 software. GRADE system was used to assess evidence quality. Additionally, trial sequence analysis (TSA) was employed to evaluate the reliability of conclusions regarding intervention effects. RESULTS: A total of 20 RCTs (1,588 patients) were included. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with control group, FEMT significantly reduced anxiety scores (Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS): MD = -7.16, 95% CI: -9.56 to -4.67, p < 0.00001; Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA): MD = -5.19, 95% CI: -9.94 to -0.45, p = 0.03) and depression scores (Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS): MD = -7.07, 95% CI: -7.90 to -6.24, p < 0.00001; Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD): MD = -5.89, 95% CI: -7.39 to -4.39, p < 0.00001), and improved sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): MD = -2.52, 95% CI: -2.89 to -2.16, p < 0.00001). Regarding quality of life, FEMT significantly improved Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) overall health status scores (MD = 9.27, 95% CI: 5.68 to 12.86, p < 0.00001), physical function, and emotional function on the QOL-C30 scale, while reducing symptom scores for fatigue and sleep disturbance. FEMT also modulated immune function (increased CD3+% and CD4+%) and inflammatory markers (increased superoxide dismutase (SOD), decreased nitric oxide (NO)). However, the methodological quality of included studies was generally low, with most outcomes graded as low or very low certainty evidence. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that FEMT may effectively alleviate anxiety and depression in chemotherapy patients, improve sleep and quality of life, and exert certain physiological regulatory effects. However, due to limitations in the number, characteristics and methodological quality of studies, the generalizability of this therapy outside of China remains unclear; further validation is needed through high-quality, large-scale, international, multicenter RCTs.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.