Skip to main content

Impact of sublingual immunotherapy with dust mite drops on ECP, TARC, VCAM-1 inflammatory status in patients with allergic rhinitis

Journal
Immunotherapy (Q2)
Published
4 August 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Bangyu Deng, Yunxia Zhao, Jisheng Liu
PMID
42550205
DOI
10.1080/1750743X.2026.2704434

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of sublingual immunotherapy with dust mite drops on serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) levels and symptom improvement in allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial enrolled 300 AR patients sensitized to dust mites, randomly assigned to control group (conventional treatment, n = 150) and research group (conventional treatment plus sublingual dust mite drops, n = 150) for 6 months. RESULTS: Compared with controls, the research group showed significantly greater reductions in interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-17 (IL-17), ECP, TARC, VCAM-1, lower adverse reaction rates, improved pulmonary function including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), FEV1/FVC ratio, and small airway function including maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), expiratory flow rate at 50% of FVC (MEF50), expiratory flow rate at 25% of FVC (MEF25), as well as reduced symptom scores (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Sublingual immunotherapy with Dust mite drops appears effective in suppressing systemic inflammation, minimizing treatment-related adverse events, enhancing both small airway and pulmonary function, and easing the clinical manifestations of allergic rhinitis.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.