Skip to main content

Latest Immunology and Allergy research

The 10 most useful immunology and allergy studies published this week, chosen from Q1 journals and graded on the Oxford CEBM evidence hierarchy. Each paper links to a short summary and the original on PubMed. Updated 7 November 2026.

Top 10 this week

Week of 1 November 2026

  1. 1

    Classroom Microbiome Signatures of Pest Management Associate with Reduced Asthma Symptoms

    The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · Q1 journal · RCT · Evidence level 1 (High) · 19 August 2026

    School intervention links allergen-related environmental changes with asthma morbidity

  2. 2

    Effect of Abrocitinib on the Skin Microbiome in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

    Allergy · Q1 journal · RCT · Evidence level 1 (High) · 2 August 2026

    In a 12-week trial of 43 patients with moderate-to-severe eczema, the higher dose of abrocitinib reduced the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus and increased overall microbial diversity, with changes evident by week 2 and continuing to week 12. These microbiome shifts paralleled clinical improvement and favorable immune-marker changes, suggesting the drug's benefit may involve restoring a healthier skin ecosystem.

  3. 3

    Immunogenicity and safety of an interchangeable vaccination schedule of two inactivated Japanese encephalitis vaccines: a multicentric, phase IV, open-label, randomized controlled trial

    EClinicalMedicine · Q1 journal · RCT · Evidence level 1 (High) · 22 September 2026

    In a randomized trial of 911 infants, mixed-brand vaccine schedules produced seroconversion in about 90%, similar to schedules using the same vaccine twice. Reported adverse events were also similar across groups, and no serious event was judged vaccine related. The results support flexibility when children switch products, but address short-term antibody response, not long-term protection against disease.

  4. 4

    Pharmacological Interventions for Neurological Manifestations of Ataxia-Telangiectasia: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Cerebellum (London, England) · Q1 journal · SR/MA of RCTs · Evidence level 1 (High) · 31 October 2026

    Across six randomized trials of drugs for ataxia-telangiectasia, two levacetylleucine trials showed no significant pooled improvement on an ataxia rating scale, with results varying substantially. A separate pooled analysis found better scores with erythrocyte-encapsulated dexamethasone, but neither trial met its primary neurological endpoint. The findings leave treatment effects uncertain and highlight the need for better outcome measures.

  5. 5

    Diagnostic performance and clinical utility of open oral food challenges using double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges as the reference standard: A systematic review

    Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology · Q1 journal · SR/MA of RCTs · Evidence level 1 (High) · 27 October 2026

    In this review of eight studies, open food challenges had a negative predictive value of 88% to 97% against blinded challenges, suggesting a negative result may help rule out food allergy. But study quality was often poor, results varied, and positive predictive value ranged from 0% to 89%; open challenges cannot yet replace blinded testing.

  6. 6

    Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy Study of Porcine and Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin in the Treatment of Patients With Severe Aplastic Anemia: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial

    MedComm · Q1 journal · RCT · Evidence level 1 (High) · 17 October 2026

    In a randomized study of 93 patients with severe aplastic anemia, complete response rates at six months were about 19% with either porcine or rabbit antithymocyte globulin; overall response rates were 70% and 57%, respectively. Two-year response and survival were similar, though the treatments affected immune cells differently. Their similar outcomes support either option, but the study was small.

  7. 7

    Effectiveness and safety of bee venom pharmacopuncture for rheumatoid arthritis-related pain and disease activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Frontiers in medicine · Q1 journal · SR/MA of RCTs · Evidence level 1 (High) · 14 October 2026

    A review of 17 randomized trials involving 1,304 people found less pain with bee venom injections at acupuncture points, alone or added to Western medicine; add-on treatment also modestly improved the chance of a 30% response. Evidence was low certainty, disease activity remained unclear, and no serious venom-related events were reported, so larger, standardized trials are needed.

  8. 8

    As-Needed Versus Regular Intranasal Corticosteroid Therapy in Pediatric Perennial Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized Double-Dummy Trial

    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · Q1 journal · RCT · Evidence level 1 (High) · 19 August 2026

    Randomized trial informs treatment of pediatric allergic rhinitis

  9. 9

    Can physical exercise improve allergic rhinitis symptoms in adults? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

    BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · Q1 journal · SR/MA of RCTs · Evidence level 1 (High) · 30 July 2026

    Randomized-trial review evaluates allergic rhinitis symptom outcomes

  10. 10

    Intervention with Polyvalent Bacterial Lysate Modulates T Helper Cell Subsets in Polish Children with Grass Pollen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis

    Biomedicines · Q1 journal · RCT · Evidence level 1 (High) · 19 July 2026

    Clinical allergic rhinitis trial examines immunomodulatory treatment effects

Paper of the day, last two weeks

Evidence summaries in Immunology and Allergy

Get this list every morning

The Web of Medicine app builds this feed for your specialty daily, with filters by evidence level and journal, audio summaries and Ask AI. Free on iOS and Android.

For healthcare professionals. Summaries are generated by AI from the published abstract and are not medical advice. Read the original paper before changing practice.