Skip to main content

Crushing Versus Resection of Concha Bullosa as an Adjunct to FESS: Long-Term Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal
The Laryngoscope (Q1)
Published
30 July 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Mario Järvekülg, Paula Virkkula, Johanna Wikstén, Ahmed Geneid, Aaro Haapaniemi, Maija Hytönen, et al.
PMID
42533380
DOI
10.1002/lary.70778

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Anatomy (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026): Concha bullosa crushing vs resection RCT
  • Picked for Gastroenterology (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
  • Picked for Otorhinolaryngology (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026): Resection of concha bullosa yields better FESS outcomes

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Concha bullosa (CB) is a common anatomical variation in patients with chronic and recurrent rhinosinusitis. Optimal surgical management of CB during functional endoscopic surgery (FESS) remains debated. This study compared crushing versus resection regarding symptom relief and endoscopic outcomes in 1-year follow-up. METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, 62 patients undergoing FESS for chronic rhinosinusitis or recurrent acute rhinosinusitis had either CB crushing or resection as an adjunct procedure. The primary outcome was change in total SNOT-22 score at 1-year follow-up. Key secondary outcomes were endoscopic findings (synechiae severity and middle meatus access). RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (crushing, n = 30; resection, n = 22) completed 1-year follow-up. Both groups demonstrated improvement in SNOT-22 scores. However, improvement was significantly greater in the resection group (median difference 12.0 points, 95% CI 2.0-20.0; p = 0.032) reaching minimal clinically significant difference of 8.9 points. Rhinological and emotional subdomains showed greater improvement with resection. Synechia severity did not differ between groups (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.38-2.60). Middle meatus access was significantly better after resection (OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.35-10.04; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Resection of concha bullosa during FESS was associated with greater symptom relief and quality of life improvement and better middle meatus access compared with crushing, without increased complications (trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06687629).

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.