Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Physical Rehabilitation Interventions on Walking Capacity and Wearable Sensor-Derived Performance After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) (Q2)
Published
8 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Joy C Ezeugwa, Aiza Khan, Deborah O Okusanya, Liz Dennett, Brian H Buck, Patricia J Manns, et al.
PMID
42515217
DOI
10.3390/s26144332

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

Improvements in walking capacity after stroke do not always translate into increased real-world performance, highlighting a critical gap in promoting long-term health after rehabilitation. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of physical rehabilitation interventions, including exercise, behaviour change techniques (BCTs), and combined approaches, on wearable sensor-derived movement behaviours and walking capacity in people with stroke. Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus) were searched through May 2026 for randomized controlled trials comparing these interventions with usual care or other interventions. Outcomes included steps per day, gait speed, and walking endurance (6-min walk test; 6MWT). Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted, reporting standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria, and 26 distinct studies were included in the meta-analyses. For real-world performance, BCT-only interventions demonstrated the largest pooled effect estimate on steps per day (SMD = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.22-0.69), followed by combined BCT + Exercise interventions (SMD = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.10-0.66), while Exercise-only interventions showed a smaller but statistically significant effect (SMD = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.02-0.44). Conversely, Exercise-only interventions were the only category associated with statistically significant improvements in walking capacity, improving both self-selected gait speed (SMD = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.13-0.58) and walking endurance (6MWT; SMD = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.25-0.57). In contrast, neither combined BCT + Exercise nor BCT-only interventions demonstrated statistically significant effects across gait speed or endurance outcomes. These findings suggest that exercise improves walking capacity, whereas interventions incorporating BCTs may have greater effects on real-world walking performance after stroke.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.