Effects of Intraovarian Platelet-Rich Plasma on Ovarian Reserve Markers, Oocyte Development, and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Diminished Ovarian Reserve: An Uncontrolled Retrospective Before-After Study

Why clinicians should know about it

• Picked for Reproductive Medicine (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026).
• Picked for Obstetrics and Gynecology (paper of the day, 29 July 2026).

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment on ovarian reserve markers, hormonal profiles, oocyte yield, fertilization potential, and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve. Methods: This retrospective single-center study was conducted at a tertiary referral center between January 2021 and December 2024 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Clinic, Private Diyarlife Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey. A total of 78 infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) were included. DOR was defined in the present study as an AMH level < 1.1 ng/mL and/or an antral follicle count (AFC) < 5 follicles. Pre-PRP and post-PRP measurements were compared in the same patients. Hormonal and clinical parameters, including prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), estradiol, endometrial thickness, gonadotropin dosage, antral follicle count (AFC), mature metaphase II (MII) oocyte count, and two-pronuclear (2PN) zygote count, were evaluated before and after PRP treatment. Results: Significant increases were observed in AMH and prolactin levels, whereas FSH levels significantly decreased following PRP treatment (all p < 0.001). Post-PRP AFC, MII oocyte count, and 2PN zygote count were significantly higher than pre-PRP values (all p < 0.001). A total of 21 pregnancies (26.9%) were achieved, including 17 clinical pregnancies (81.0% of pregnancies; 21.8% of all patients), 4 biochemical pregnancies (19.0% of pregnancies; 5.1% of all patients), 11 miscarriages (52.4% of pregnancies; 14.1% of all patients), and 6 live births (28.6% of pregnancies; 7.7% of all patients). Significant positive correlations were identified between post-PRP AFC and MII oocyte count (r = 0.803, p < 0.001), post-PRP AFC and 2PN zygote count (r = 0.624, p < 0.001), and MII oocyte count and 2PN zygote count (r = 0.728, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intraovarian PRP administration was associated with improvements in ovarian reserve markers, oocyte maturation, and fertilization-related outcomes in women with DOR. Significant increases in AFC, MII oocyte count, and 2PN zygote count were observed after PRP treatment. However, these improvements in ovarian reserve markers were not associated with significant differences between women who achieved pregnancy and those who did not. Because of the retrospective design and the absence of a control group, these findings should be interpreted as associations rather than evidence of a causal treatment effect. Although clinical pregnancies and live births were observed during follow-up, larger, multicenter randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings and to further evaluate the effect of PRP on reproductive outcomes.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.