Skip to main content

Comparing the Efficacy of Advanced Interleukin Inhibitors for Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Journal
Journal of clinical medicine (Q1)
Published
16 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Qiuyue Zhang, Mengqi Luo, Yufang Wang
PMID
42513507
DOI
10.3390/jcm15145593

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Gastroenterology (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026): Network meta‑analysis of IL‑23p19 inhibitors vs ustekinumab in Crohn's disease

Abstract

Background: IL-23p19 inhibitors have recently gained approval for treating moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD). Nevertheless, their comparative efficacy relative to each other and to the IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab (UST) is controversial. Therefore, this study evaluated risankizumab (RZB), mirikizumab (MRK), guselkumab (GUS), and UST for inducing and maintaining clinical and endoscopic remission in the moderate-to-severe CD population. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until 4 November 2025. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. The clinical and endoscopic remission/response during induction and maintenance phases was examined through a frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA). Subgroup analyses were carried out in the biologic-naïve population and those with prior biologic failure. Results: This NMA included 15 RCTs within 11 studies with 7747 patients. Relative to UST, IL-23p19 inhibitors demonstrated superior efficacy during induction and maintenance therapy. For clinical remission during the induction, GUS < 600 mg displayed significantly greater efficacy than UST 6 mg/kg (RR: 1.34 [95% CI: 1.06-1.70]). For endoscopic remission during the induction, both RZB > 600 mg (RR: 1.66 [95% CI: 1.14-2.41]) and RZB ≤ 600 mg (RR: 1.65 [95% CI: 1.21-2.25]) were superior to UST 6 mg/kg. During maintenance therapy, 200 mg GUS achieved a higher rate of endoscopic remission than UST (RR: 2.04 [95% CI: 1.09-3.49]). According to the SUCRA rankings, IL-23p19 inhibitors, particularly GUS and RZB, consistently ranked above UST across all evaluated outcomes. Conclusions: IL-23p19 inhibitors demonstrated superior efficacy in comparison to the IL-12/23 inhibitor UST in the moderate-to-severe CD population. Further high-quality, long-term, multicenter RCTs and real-world studies could confirm these findings.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.