Stair-step versus traditional clomiphene citrate protocols in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Why clinicians should know about it

• Picked for Reproductive Medicine (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026).
• Picked for Obstetrics and Gynecology (top studies of the week, 2 August 2026).

Abstract

This review explores whether the clomiphene citrate stair-step protocol (SSP) for ovulation induction in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) outperforms the traditional protocol. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE and Google Scholar from inception to 15 June 2025, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and with PROSPERO registration (CRD420251050294). Of 847 screened records, five randomized controlled trials were included (n = 520: SSP: n = 255; traditional protocol: n = 265). Analyses were conducted in Review Manager 5.4 using random-effects models. Risk ratios, mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed with I², risk of bias with RoB2, certainty with GRADE and robustness with leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. The SSP increased ovulation rates compared with the traditional protocol (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.49; five randomized controlled trials [RCTs], n = 520, I² = 0%). Clinical pregnancy also favoured SSP (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.05; four RCTs, n = 460; I² = 0%), although this result was largely driven by one study. The SSP shortened treatment duration (mean difference -32.59 days, 95% CI -38.66 to -26.52 days; three RCTs, n = 320, I² = 83%). Endometrial thickness was similar (mean difference 0.32 mm, 95% CI -0.95 to 1.59 mm; four RCTs, n = 460, I² = 91%). SSP improves ovulation rate and shortens treatment without affecting endometrial thickness and may increase clinical pregnancy rates.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.