Efficacy and safety of abaloparatide, denosumab, teriparatide, oral bisphosphonates, and intravenous bisphosphonates in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
- Journal
- Frontiers in endocrinology (Q1)
- Published
- 9 July 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Yan Wang, Xiaoyan Wang, Guihong Yu, Libao Zhang, Changhui Xue, Wanchen Gong, et al.
- PMID
- 42494861
- DOI
- 10.3389/fendo.2026.1886136
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
- Picked for Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
- Picked for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
- Picked for Pharmacology (medical) (paper of the day, 25 July 2026).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postmenopausal osteoporosis increases the risk of fractures, particularly in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip. Pharmacological interventions include anabolic agents (abaloparatide [ABA], teriparatide [TER]), antiresorptive agents (oral/intravenous bisphosphonates [OBP/IBP], denosumab [DEN]), and conventional therapy or placebo (PLA/CTRL). Evidence on their comparative efficacy and safety in postmenopausal women is limited. METHODS: We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of ABA, TER, OBP, IBP, DEN, and PLA/CTRL in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Primary outcomes included changes in lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip bone mineral density (BMD). Safety outcomes included all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Data were synthesized using SUCRA rankings and network consistency was assessed via node-splitting and deviance information criteria (DIC). RESULTS: Twenty-three RCTs comprising 80-7, 808 postmenopausal women were included. ABA demonstrated the greatest improvement in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD, followed by TER, while ABA showed the highest effect on total hip BMD. IBP and DEN provided moderate benefits, superior to PLA/CTRL. TER and OBP had the lowest risk for AEs, and ABA and PLA/CTRL showed the lowest risk for SAEs. Overall, anabolic agents significantly improved BMD at the spine and femoral neck, whereas antiresorptive agents were more effective for hip BMD. CONCLUSIONS: ABA and TER are most effective for improving spinal and femoral neck BMD in postmenopausal women, whereas ABA is superior for total hip BMD. Safety profiles were favorable for TER, OBP, and ABA. These findings provide evidence to guide individualized treatment selection based on fracture risk and high-risk skeletal sites in postmenopausal women.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.