Skip to main content

Impact of HIF-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors on VEGF expression and vascular adverse events in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of 34 randomized controlled trials

Journal
Journal of nephrology (Q2)
Published
23 July 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Seyed Mahdi Montazer, Amirali Asadi, Amirali Taghipour, Arshia Rajabi, Arshak Shabanian, Mehdi Daraei, et al.
PMID
42488997
DOI
10.1093/joneph/aajag065

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Hematology (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
  • Picked for Nephrology (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).
  • Picked for Ophthalmology (top studies of the week, 26 July 2026).

Abstract

Background Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are novel oral agents used to treat renal anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). While their erythropoietic effects are well-documented, the potential consequences of HIF-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) activation remain uncertain. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of HIF-PHI therapy on VEGF levels and the risk of VEGF-related adverse outcomes in CKD patients. Methods We systematically analyzed 34 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 26 trials reporting VEGF levels and additional data on cancer, diabetic retinopathy, peripheral edema, and thrombosis. Subgroup analyses were performed based on drug type, treatment duration, dialysis status, trial phase, and comparator type. Results HIF-PHI treatment was associated with a modest but significant increase in VEGF levels (SMD = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.07-0.39) and a reproducible increase in peripheral edema risk (log RR = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.09-0.35). No significant associations were found for cancer, diabetic retinopathy, or thrombosis. Dialysis status moderated VEGF response, with greater elevation observed in dialysis-dependent patients. Conclusion HIF-PHIs modestly increase VEGF expression, with peripheral edema as the most consistent adverse signal. However, no evidence of oncologic or retinal harm was found in the short term. Long-term surveillance is recommended.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.