The Effectiveness of Midwife-Led and Nurse-Led Interventions on Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy and Exclusive Breastfeeding Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
In brief
Midwife- and nurse-led support more than doubles exclusive breastfeeding at 20 weeks
In a meta-analysis of 21 trials (2,415 women), postpartum counseling by nurses or midwives boosted breastfeeding self-efficacy early on (large effect size) and raised exclusive breastfeeding rates by 22% at one month, 61% at three months, and 135% at five months. Benefits were strongest in the Middle East, but high study variability means optimal program design remains uncertain.
- Journal
- Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association (Q2)
- Published
- 18 July 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Gloria Anderson, Jessica Preziosi, Giorgia Gabrielli, Simona Proia, Erika Colagiovanni, Francesca Rizzi, et al.
- PMID
- 42470127
- DOI
- 10.1177/08903344261451214
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Obstetrics and Gynecology (paper of the day, 19 July 2026).
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Several factors influence breastfeeding, including breastfeeding self-efficacy, which can be enhanced through midwives' or nurses' interventions. While previous reviews have evaluated the effectiveness of programs targeting breastfeeding self-efficacy, none have specifically assessed the impact of nurse- or midwife-led interventions. RESEARCH AIM: To systematically review the literature and evaluate studies assessing the efficacy of nurse-led and midwife-led interventions on BSE and exclusive breastfeeding rates. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted per PRISMA guidelines, searched databases such as MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, the Cochrane Database, and PsycINFO. We included randomized controlled trials enrolling healthy pregnant or postpartum women (P), comparing nurse‑ or midwife‑led interventions (I) with usual care (C). The primary outcome was breastfeeding self-efficacy; secondary outcomes were exclusive breastfeeding rates and exclusive breastfeeding duration (O). The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool assessed study quality, and a random-effects meta-analysis calculated standardized mean differences for breastfeeding self-efficacy and risk ratio for exclusive breastfeeding. RESULTS: A total of 21 randomized controlled trials encompassing 2,415 participants were identified, primarily conducted in Asia and the Middle East. The interventions significantly increased breastfeeding self-efficacy from 15 days (N = 1343; SMD = 1.75; 95% CI [0.94; 2.56], I2 = 97%, p < 0.01) up to 6 months (N = 246; SMD: 0.56; 95% CI [0.31; 0.82]; I2 = 0%, p = 0.48) postpartum and improved exclusive breastfeeding rates at 4 (N = 650; RR = 1.22; 95% CI [1.04; 1.41], I2 = 0%, p = 0.48), 12 (N = 718; RR = 1.61; 95% CI [1.25; 2.08], I2 = 52%, p = 0.05), and 20 weeks (N = 487; RR = 2.35; 95% CI [1.47; 3.76], I2 = 52%, p = 0.06) postpartum. Subgroup analyses highlighted that interventions were particularly effective in the Middle East, during the immediate postpartum, with durations exceeding 1 day, and through mono-component strategies. However, substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies, driven by different geographical location, timing, duration, and intervention type. CONCLUSION: Postpartum support from nurses and midwives is vital for promoting breastfeeding. Results emphasize the importance of tailored, long-term interventions to improve maternal and infant health outcomes, with further research needed to align strategies with World Health Organization recommendations. However, the high heterogeneity observed for breastfeeding self-efficacy limits the certainty of the pooled estimate, and should be carefully considered when interpreting the results.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.