Skip to main content

Community Optometrist-Led Monitoring of Quiescent Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The FENETRE Randomized Clinical Trial

In brief

Community eye monitoring was noninferior, with missed activity in 4% of patients

In a randomized trial, trained community optometrists monitoring quiescent neovascular age-related macular degeneration missed disease activity requiring treatment in 3.8% of patients, compared with 7.8% under hospital monitoring, meeting the trial's noninferiority standard. Community monitoring also led to more false alarms, 8.4% versus 3.5%; whether this model can sustain safe monitoring beyond one year remains unknown.

Journal
JAMA Network Open (Q1)
Published
1 June 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Anitta Sharma, Aljazy Jaber, Bishwanath Pal, John G Lawrenson, Robert A Harper, Adnan Tufail, et al.
PMID
42295759
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.17984

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Ophthalmology (top studies of the week, 11 October 2026): Noninferiority RCT, community optometrist monitoring of nAMD

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Hospital-based ophthalmology faces increasing demand for long-term monitoring of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Safe redistribution of routine monitoring to community clinicians is relevant to integrated community (primary)-secondary care models. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether community optometrist-led monitoring of nAMD is noninferior to hospital-based monitoring for detecting disease activity requiring treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 8, 2019, to January 31, 2024, at secondary centers (17 hospitals) and primary centers (60 community optometry practices) with 12-month follow-up. Statisticians were masked to patient grouping. Adults 55 years or older with quiescent AMD in at least 1 eye (and quiescent or nonneovascular disease in the other) were recruited at participating hospitals. Data analysis was performed from October 2024 to March 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized 1:1 to monitoring sessions once every 2 months in hospitals (control) or community practices (intervention). Trained and accredited optometrists performed optical coherence tomography imaging, clinical examination, patient management, and online reporting at each visit. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome (participant level) was a binary indicator of whether a false-negative clinical management decision occurred at any visit within 12 months (missed quiescent nAMD reactivation or new fellow-eye nAMD, adjudicated by a central reading-center reference standard). The noninferiority margin was a 10-percentage point absolute risk difference. Secondary outcomes were false-positive clinical management decisions, attendance adherence, visual acuity change, harms, loss to follow-up, suspicious classifications, and confirmation visit outcomes. RESULTS: Of 704 randomized participants, 635 (90.2%) completed at least 1 follow-up visit, including 287 at community practices (mean [SD] age, 80.6 [8.1] years; 236 [67.4%] female) and 348 at hospitals (mean [SD] age, 80.1 [8.5] years; 203 [57.3%] female). False-negative clinical management decisions occurred in 11 of 287 community participants (3.8%) vs 27 of 348 hospital participants (7.8%) (risk difference, -3.9 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.4 to -0.3 percentage points; P = .04; adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.24-1.07; P = .08), meeting noninferiority. False-positive clinical management decisions occurred in 24 of 287 community participants (8.4%) vs 12 of 348 hospital participants (3.5%) (risk difference, 4.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.9-9.0 percentage points). Findings were consistent across per-protocol, cluster-adjusted, and relative risk sensitivity analyses. No adverse event-related withdrawals occurred. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, community optometrist-led monitoring of quiescent nAMD was noninferior to hospital monitoring for detecting disease activity requiring treatment. These results provide evidence for its use in integrated clinical care models. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03893474.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.