Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Bullous Pemphigoid: A Danish Nationwide Case-Control Study
In brief
Current vildagliptin use linked to nearly 11-fold higher odds of pemphigoid
In a Danish study of 2,497 people with bullous pemphigoid, current use of DPP-4 diabetes drugs was associated with 5.6 times the odds of the rare skin disease. The association was strongest for vildagliptin and linagliptin and weaker for sitagliptin; other diabetes drugs showed no similar signal. The observational study cannot establish that these drugs caused the disease.
- Journal
- Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) (Q1)
- Published
- 6 November 2026
- Study design
- Case-control study
- Evidence level
- Level 3, Low (CEBM 3b)
- Authors
- Philip Ahle Erichsen, Ida M Heerfordt, Rasmus Huan Olsen, Mette Mogensen, Kim Peder Dalhoff, Henrik Horwitz
- PMID
- 42993181
- DOI
- 10.1159/drm/ackag032
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Dermatology (paper of the day, 8 November 2026): Large population study links DPP-4 inhibitors with bullous pemphigoid
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Anti-diabetic dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are associated with an increased risk of bullous pemphigoid (BP), but Danish population-based data, including product specific estimates, are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide matched case-control study in Denmark of incident BP cases diagnosed between 2007 and 2024. BP cases were matched 1:100 to population controls using risk set sampling based on age, sex, and index date. DPP-4i exposure was defined as at least one redeemed prescription before the index date (ever use) or during the preceding three months (current use). In a specificity analysis, we compared DPP-4i users and users of other type 2 antidiabetics without DPP-4i use with non-users of type 2 diabetes medications. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were estimated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 2,497 incident BP cases and 249,700 controls (median age 78 years). DPP-4i exposure was more common among BP cases for both ever use (OR: 3.81, 95% CI: 3.31-4.40) and current use (OR: 5.59, 95% CI: 4.70-6.63). For current use, the highest odds ratios were observed for vildagliptin (OR: 10.82, 95% CI: 6.73-17.41) and linagliptin (OR: 9.86, 95% CI: 7.33-13.25), whereas the estimate for sitagliptin was lower (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.65-3.66). In the specificity analysis, other antidiabetic therapies did not show a similarly increased risk of BP. CONCLUSION: In the Danish population there was a strong association between DPP-4i use and incident BP. This was most pronounced for vildagliptin and linagliptin while the signal was weaker for sitagliptin.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.