Skip to main content

End-of-Dose Effect as a Guide for Biologic Optimization in Hidradenitis Suppurativa

In brief

A tailored strategy was linked to disease-score improvement in 54% of hidradenitis patients

In a single-center retrospective cohort, 50 of 93 patients (54%) with partial response to biologics had at least a 3-point reduction in disease severity after treatment was tailored to whether symptoms returned before the next injection. Overall scores and patient-reported improvement also improved; gains persisted at 6 to 12 months in 65 patients. Without a comparison group, prospective studies must confirm whether this pattern should guide treatment.

Journal
JAMA dermatology (Q1)
Published
4 November 2026
Study design
Prospective / inception cohort
Evidence level
Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2b)
Authors
Albertine Lynch, Julie Archimbaud, Cécile Lesort, Liza Benzoni, Lucas Klepfisch, Denis Jullien, et al.
PMID
42981090
DOI
10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.4435

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Dermatology (paper of the day, 6 November 2026): Real-world biologic optimization for hidradenitis partial responders

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Up to one-half of patients treated with licensed biologics for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) achieve only a partial response, yet no consensus exists on subsequent management. Dose intensification and long-term antibiotic addition are used in routine practice, but real-world data on their effectiveness remain limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a response-pattern-guided biologic optimization framework in HS partial responders. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary dermatology center in France from January 2022 to March 2025. Patients with HS and insufficient response to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α or anti-interleukin 17 (IL-17) therapy (at least 4 flares per year despite at least 3 months of standard-dose biologic) were included. Data were analyzed from August to October 2025. EXPOSURES: Patients with an end-of-dose effect (recurrence of disease activity before the next injection) underwent dose intensification (optimization group; n = 52); those without received antibiotic addition (combination group; n = 50) per a prespecified algorithm. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) response (at least 3-point reduction) at 3 to 5 months; secondary outcomes included IHS4 score reduction of 55% or more, IHS4 stage shift, pain numeric rating scale, flare-frequency and flare-duration responses, and patient-reported global improvement. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with doubly robust adjustment addressed allocation bias. RESULTS: Among 107 included patients, 51 (47.7%) were female and 56 (52.3%) were male; the mean (SD) age was 31.7 (9.5) years and the median (IQR) disease duration was 10 (6-16) years. A total of 52 underwent dose intensification and 50 received antibiotic addition. The mean (SD) IHS4 decreased from 7.0 (4.8) to 3.9 (4.2) at 3 to 5 months (P < .001), with 50 of 93 (53.8%) reaching IHS4 response, 50 of 99 (50.5%) a 55% or greater reduction in IHS4 score, 52 of 102 (51.0%) flare-frequency response, and 65 of 100 (65.0%) global improvement. An exploratory between-arm comparison showed a nominally significant signal favoring intensification on flare-duration response (odds ratio, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.07-6.11) that did not persist after multiplicity adjustment (adjusted P = .24). Improvement was sustained at 6 to 12 months in 65 patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort of patients with HS who partially responded to biologics, a response-pattern-guided optimization framework was associated with clinically meaningful improvement across all prespecified outcomes. The end-of-dose effect may serve as a candidate phenotyping tool to guide optimization strategy selection, pending prospective confirmation.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.