Sex differences in the diabetes-related risk of incident myocardial infarction and relationship to established coronary heart disease risk factors: the Tromsø Study (1979-2016)
- Journal
- European heart journal open (Q1)
- Published
- 21 October 2026
- Study design
- Prospective / inception cohort
- Evidence level
- Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2b)
- Authors
- Grethe Albrektsen, Tom Wilsgaard, Ivar Heuch, Dag S Thelle, Maja-Lisa Løchen, Sameline Grimsgaard, et al.
- PMID
- 42979041
- DOI
- 10.1093/ehjopen/oeag174
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Epidemiology (paper of the day, 9 November 2026): Longitudinal population cohort examines diabetes, MI risk, and confounding factors
Abstract
AIMS: To examine whether the adverse effect of diabetes on the risk of incident myocardial infarction (MI) differs between sexes and assess to what extent established coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors contribute to the elevated risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective study of 42 907 Tromsø Study participants (51.5% women) with 3942 incident MI (357 with diabetes) at ages 35-104 years. Relative risks [incidence rate ratio (IRR)] were estimated in Poisson regression analyses. Impact of CHD risk factors was quantified as a percentage change in the regression coefficient for diabetes. A contrast in risk of MI by diabetes status was seen from age 45 years in men and 55 years in women. Adjusted for age and birth cohort, the IRR was 2.26 in women and 1.84 in men (P = 0.12, test for interaction). In a mutually adjusted model, adjustment for the triglyceride-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio weakened the association with diabetes similarly in women (-19.0%) and men (-17.0%); systolic blood pressure had a larger impact in women (-10.3% vs. +2.2%), whereas smoking strengthened the association more in men (+23.1% vs. +7.1%). Body mass index had a minor impact. A larger joint impact of adjustment factors in women (-33.6% vs. -15.9%) narrowed the initial gender gap (adjusted IRR of 1.72 and 1.67, respectively). Adverse lipid levels and increasing systolic blood pressure emerged already during the pre-diabetic phase. CONCLUSION: Traditional CHD risk factors contributed substantially to the diabetes-related risk of incident MI. A larger joint impact of these factors in women reduced the initial observed sex difference in the adverse effect of diabetes.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.