Association Between Craniotomy and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Subdural Hematoma: Analysis of a Nationwide Trauma Registry in Japan
In brief
Craniotomy was linked to 15-point higher survival in large subdural bleeds
In matched patients with large acute subdural hematomas, 77% who underwent craniotomy survived to discharge, compared with 63% who did not. The observational study found no improvement in favorable neurological outcomes at discharge, and the survival association was strongest in patients 65 or older and those with lower Glasgow Coma Scale scores; treatment decisions still need to account for individual patient factors.
- Journal
- Neurosurgery (Q1)
- Published
- 30 October 2026
- Study design
- Cohort / observational study
- Evidence level
- Level 3, Low (CEBM 3b)
- Authors
- Keita Shibahashi, Ken Inoue, Taichi Kato, Kazuhiro Sugiyama
- PMID
- 42961038
- DOI
- 10.1227/neu.0000000000004265
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Emergency Medicine (paper of the day, 2 November 2026): Trauma-registry comparison informs acute subdural hematoma surgical decisions
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The benefits of surgery remain unclear in less severe cases of acute subdural hematoma (ASDH). We aimed to investigate the association between surgical intervention and outcomes in patients with ASDH. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study analyzed data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank between January 2019 and December 2023. Patients age 18 years and older with large supratentorial ASDH (>50 cm3, >1 cm thick) and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 6 to 15 at hospital arrival were included. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compare patients who underwent craniotomy with those who did not. Study outcomes included survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 1808 patients (median age, 79 years; 64.9% male) from 83 hospitals were included, and 46.6% underwent craniotomy. Craniotomy rates ranged from 0.0% to 83.3% (median, 46.2%) across hospitals. Propensity score matching identified 610 matched patients with and without craniotomy. Patients who underwent craniotomy had a significantly higher survival rate (77.2% vs 62.6%; within-hospital difference, 14.7%; 95% CI, 9.6%-19.8%); however, no significant difference was observed in the proportion of favorable neurological outcomes at discharge (16.1% vs 17.9%; within-hospital difference, -1.9%; 95% CI, -7.5% to 3.7%). Subgroups analyses demonstrated significant interactions between craniotomy and both age and GCS scores, with greater benefit observed in patients age 65 years and older (difference, 3.9% [<65 years] vs 17.1% [≥65 years]) and in those with a GCS score of 6 to 12 (difference, 27.8% [GCS 6-12] vs -6.1% [GCS 13-15]). CONCLUSION: In patients with large ASDHs, craniotomy was significantly associated with improved survival, particularly among patients age 65 years and older and those with lower GCS scores (6-12). A uniform approach based solely on hematoma thickness may be suboptimal. Instead, surgical decision-making needs to adopt a more individualized approach that incorporates age and neurological severity.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.