Effect of the CP@clinic program (Community Paramedicine at Clinic program) on health care utilization from administrative data during and after the intervention: a cluster-randomized controlled trial
In brief
Community paramedicine cut admission rates 25% during trial, 18% afterward
Across 30 Ontario apartment buildings housing low-income older adults, hospital admission rates were 25% lower during the 12-month program and 18% lower in the following year than with usual care. Emergency visits and days hospitalized did not differ; primary care visits dipped during the trial, then rose slightly afterward, leaving the reasons for the sustained reduction unclear.
- Journal
- Frontiers in health services (Q1)
- Published
- 15 October 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Gina Agarwal, Melissa Pirrie, Manasvi Sai Vanama, Zheng Jing Hu, J Michael Paterson, Lehana Thabane, et al.
- PMID
- 42959155
- DOI
- 10.3389/frhs.2026.1939050
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Family Practice (paper of the day, 31 October 2026): Community program trial addresses preventive care for older adults
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The study objective was to compare the effects of the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) program versus usual care on building-level health service utilization during a 12-month trial period and 12 months post-trial. METHODS: This study employed a longitudinal, repeated cross-sectional design within a cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT). It involved 30 apartment buildings across five Ontario communities, housing low-income older adults. Buildings were paired and randomized to receive either the CP@clinic intervention or continuing with usual care. Data was derived from ICES-maintained administrative health databases, linked using unique identifiers. The sample included all residents aged 55 + in the study postal codes from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) Registered Persons Database (RPDB), excluding those aged 120+, ineligible for OHIP, and those with no health care encounters within 7 years. The primary health care utilization outcome was emergency department visits by ambulance and other outcomes included hospital admissions and primary care visits. RESULTS: CP@clinic buildings showed significantly lower hospital admission rates during both the 12-month RCT period (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR]: 0.75 [0.61,0.91]) and the 12-month post-RCT period [aIRR: 0.82 (0.70,0.96)] compared to usual care buildings. Primary care visits were lower in CP@clinic buildings during the RCT (aIRR: 0.93 [0.88,0.99]) but higher in the post-RCT period (aIRR: 1.05 [1.00,1.10]). No significant differences were found in emergency department visits or the number of days admitted between groups in either period. DISCUSSION: CP@clinic was linked to a sustained reduction in hospital admissions and an increase in primary care visits beyond the RCT time period, reflecting a shift from reactive to preventive care among older adults residing in social housing. The lasting impact beyond the RCT period suggests that the CP@clinic Program can improve health system efficiency, primary care access, and reduce health inequities in vulnerable populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02152891.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.