Peripheral nerve block injection pressure monitoring: A systematic review
In brief
A 15-psi cutoff inconsistently flags hazardous nerve-block needle placement
Across 28 animal and human cadaver studies, intraneural injections generally produced higher pressures than perineural injections, but readings overlapped across needle locations. Low pressure did not rule out intraneural placement, and high pressure also occurred with needle-nerve contact or fascial injection; no cutoff is clinically validated, and whether monitoring prevents nerve injury remains unknown.
- Journal
- Journal of clinical anesthesia (Q1)
- Published
- 29 October 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review of cohort studies
- Evidence level
- Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2a)
- Authors
- Alessandro De Cassai, Xavier Capdevila, Steve Coppens, Roberto Dossi, Burhan Dost, Kariem El-Boghdadly, et al.
- PMID
- 42956498
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jclinane.2026.112361
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Anatomy (top studies of the week, 1 November 2026): Reviews anatomically localized nerve injection pressure evidence
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether injection pressure and pressure-time characteristics can discriminate potentially hazardous needle-tip locations during peripheral nerve injection. DESIGN: Systematic review of experimental preclinical studies with narrative synthesis. SETTING: Animal, ex vivo biological nerve, and human cadaver models of peripheral nerve injection. INTERVENTIONS: Needle placement and injection at intraneural, intrafascicular, perineural, or extraneural locations. MEASUREMENTS: CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to April 28, 2026 and updated on September 19, 2026. Studies reporting opening, peak, or plateau pressure or pressure-time characteristics in relation to anatomically defined needle-tip location were eligible. Human clinical studies and non-biological bench models were excluded. Risk of bias was evaluated using SYRCLE for animal studies and a domain-based framework for cadaveric studies. Because of substantial heterogeneity in experimental models, injection techniques, and pressure definitions, meta-analysis was not considered appropriate. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria: 12 animal or animal ex vivo studies and 16 human cadaver studies. Intraneural injection was generally associated with higher peak and plateau pressures than perineural injection, but substantial overlap occurred across needle locations. Importantly, low pressure did not reliably rule out intraneural injection, while elevated pressure was also observed during needle-nerve contact and fascial injection. Consequently, the commonly proposed 15-psi threshold showed inconsistent sensitivity across experimental settings. Lower thresholds, including 12 psi, appeared more sensitive in some models but have not been clinically validated. Beyond absolute pressure values, the rate of pressure rise and pressure-time curve morphology showed potential for differentiating needle-tip locations. CONCLUSIONS: Injection pressure monitoring may provide a nonspecific warning of needle placement within or against a poorly compliant structure. However, preclinical evidence alone cannot establish whether it should be used routinely or whether it reduces nerve injury. No universal pressure threshold or clinically recommended injection rate can currently be defined.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.