Skip to main content

Benmelstobart With or Without Anlotinib After Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The R-ALPS Randomized Clinical Trial

In brief

Benmelstobart plus anlotinib raised median progression-free survival to 15.1 months

In this trial of unresectable stage III lung cancer after chemoradiotherapy, median progression-free survival was 15.1 months with benmelstobart plus anlotinib and 9.7 months with benmelstobart alone, versus 4.2 months with placebo. The combination did not significantly outperform benmelstobart alone in the pooled comparison and caused more severe and fatal treatment-related events, leaving its added benefit uncertain.

Journal
JAMA oncology (Q1)
Published
29 October 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Yongling Ji, Qiwen Li, Long Chen, Qingsong Pang, Ou Jiang, Yuanyuan Chen, et al.
PMID
42955021
DOI
10.1001/jamaoncol.2026.3918

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Consolidation immunotherapy improves outcomes after chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Disease progression remains common, and more effective consolidation strategies are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of benmelstobart with or without anlotinib as consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial took place at 42 centers in China from 2020 to 2023 among patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC without progression after concurrent or sequential chemoradiotherapy. In stage 1, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 2 active regimens or placebo; in stage 2, additional patients were randomized 1:1 between the active regimens to power their direct comparison. Data cutoffs were November 30, 2023, for stage 1 and July 8, 2024, for the pooled analysis. Data analysis was performed from January 17 to March 23, 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive benmelstobart plus anlotinib, benmelstobart plus anlotinib placebo, or their matching placebos. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end point was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Of 553 participants (median [IQR] age, 62 [56-67] years; 495 male individuals [89.5%]), 390 were randomized in stage 1 and 163 in stage 2. In stage 1, median PFS was 15.1 months (95% CI, 9.4-21.7) with benmelstobart plus anlotinib, 9.7 months (95% CI, 6.0-34.4) with benmelstobart alone, and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.8) with placebo. The hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.49 (95% CI, 0.36-0.66; P < .001) for benmelstobart plus anlotinib vs placebo and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.39-0.72; P < .001) for benmelstobart vs placebo. In the pooled stage 1 and 2 analysis, median PFS was 17.4 (95% CI, 12.5-24.8) months with benmelstobart plus anlotinib and 11.2 (95% CI, 7.0-20.7) months with benmelstobart alone (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.63-1.08; P = .12). Grade 3 to 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 48.8%, 29.4%, and 19.7% in the benmelstobart plus anlotinib, benmelstobart alone, and placebo groups, respectively; grade 5 events occurred in 7.2%, 1.4%, and 1.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial found that benmelstobart with or without anlotinib significantly improved PFS compared with placebo. Adding anlotinib did not significantly improve PFS compared with benmelstobart alone and increased severe and fatal treatment-related adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04325763.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.