The consideration of time since stroke on intervention outcomes for post-stroke depression and anxiety: A systematic review
In brief
Earlier post-stroke treatment more often improved depression in 14 trial reports
Across 14 publications, studies recruiting patients earlier after stroke more often reported better depression outcomes with psychological interventions than with control care. Evidence on anxiety was sparse, appearing in only four studies, and high variation and low study quality make the timing signal preliminary. Better reporting and direct comparisons are needed to establish when treatment works best.
- Journal
- Neuropsychological rehabilitation (Q1)
- Published
- 29 October 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Ellis W Blyth, Joshua J Blake, Yeuk Yu Ng, Anna Mulvey, Jinnie Ooi
- PMID
- 42954351
- DOI
- 10.1080/09602011.2026.2730622
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Rehabilitation (top studies of the week, 1 November 2026): Post-stroke depression interventions across recovery timelines
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore the impact of time since stroke on post-stroke mood intervention outcomes. Four databases were searched from inception to November 2025. RCTs that involved psychological interventions for managing depression or anxiety in adult stroke survivors, with an active or passive control group, were included. Risk of bias was assessed and a narrative synthesis conducted. Fourteen publications were included in this review at data extraction. Due to time since stroke reporting limitations, synthesis was split by maximum time since stroke recruitment of less than three months, six months, and over six months post-stroke. A higher proportion of studies conducted at an earlier time since stroke reported significant improvement in depression following the intervention compared to controls. Only four studies included anxiety as an outcome. The results provide preliminary indication that interventions were more frequently effective when provided earlier in the recovery timeline; however, extreme caution is required with interpretation due to high heterogeneity and low-quality research. Future RCTs on interventions for post-stroke mood should routinely report time since stroke, consider directly investigating the impact of time since stroke on intervention outcomes, and use other methods to synthesize existing research.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.