Skip to main content

Comparison of Surgical Approaches for Hirschsprung's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis

In brief

Robotic surgery had lowest blood loss; bowel outcomes were similar across approaches

A network meta-analysis of 28 studies and 1,911 patients found robotic surgery had the lowest blood loss, transanal Swenson had the shortest operating time, and laparoscopic Swenson ranked best for length of stay. Postoperative enterocolitis, constipation, and incontinence did not differ significantly, suggesting technique choice chiefly affects perioperative efficiency; direct comparisons and longer-term evidence remain important.

Journal
Journal of pediatric surgery (Q1)
Published
28 October 2026
Study design
Systematic review of cohort studies
Evidence level
Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2a)
Authors
Hsiao-Chien Ku, Chin-Hung Wei, Yan-Jiun Huang, Fu-Huan Huang
PMID
42951178
DOI
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2026.163568

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Pediatric Surgery (paper of the day, 29 October 2026): Compares Hirschsprung pull-through approaches and bowel-function outcomes

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hirschsprung's disease can be treated using multiple procedures, including Soave, Swenson, and Duhamel techniques, performed via open, laparoscopic, transanal, or robotic approaches. However, the optimal surgical approaches remain controversial, particularly regarding perioperative efficiency and long-term bowel function. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare these approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from inception until the last update on October 31, 2025. Nine techniques (open, laparoscopic, transanal Soave and Swenson; open, laparoscopic Duhamel; and robotic-assisted procedures) were included. Primary outcomes were operative time, length of stay, and blood loss; secondary outcomes were postoperative Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC), constipation, and fecal incontinence. A random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted using MetaInsight to obtain the ranking probabilities. RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies, including 1,911 patients, were included. For perioperative outcomes, Transanal Swenson (TSw) had the shortest operative time, followed by Transanal Soave (TS) and Laparoscopic Swenson (LSw), whereas Open/ Laparoscopic Duhamel and robotic-assisted procedures required longer times. LSw ranked best for length of stay, and Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with shorter hospitalization compared with most open techniques. Robotic-assisted surgery showed the lowest intraoperative blood loss and was statistically superior to the other approaches. No significant differences were observed in postoperative HAEC, constipation, or incontinence; bowel function outcomes were comparable across techniques. CONCLUSION: This is the first network meta-analysis to comprehensively compare all major surgical approaches, suggesting that the choice of surgical approach for Hirschsprung's disease mainly affects perioperative efficiency rather than long-term bowel function. Minimally invasive and transanal procedures offer advantages in operative time and hospitalization, and robotic surgery minimizes blood loss. No significant differences were identified in postoperative HAEC, constipation, or incontinence. These findings may guide surgical planning in consideration of perioperative care.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.