Instrumental Support Calls vs. Caring Contacts Texts to Prevent Suicide in Adolescents and Adults: The SPARC Randomized Clinical Trial
- Journal
- The American journal of psychiatry (Q1)
- Published
- 28 October 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Anna K Radin, Jenny Shaw, Siobhan P Brown, Hilary Flint, Tara Fouts, Elizabeth McCue, et al.
- PMID
- 42946687
- DOI
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.20260157
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Family Practice (paper of the day, 29 October 2026): Adults receiving instrumental support calls had lower suicidal ideation
- Picked for Psychiatry and Mental Health (paper of the day, 29 October 2026): Randomized comparison informs suicide-prevention follow-up care
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to determine whether augmenting usual suicide care with follow-up in the form of instrumental support calls (ISC) or two-way Caring Contacts texts (CC) works best to reduce suicidal ideation and behavior (SI/SB) in adolescents and adults. METHODS: The Suicide Prevention Among Recipients of Care (SPARC) Trial is a pragmatic comparative effectiveness randomized clinical trial stratified by age, with participants randomized in a 1:1 ratio to ISC or CC. Participants were adolescents (12-17 years, N=723) and adults (18+ years, N=797) who screened at risk for suicide in emergency departments (N=9) and primary care clinics (N=36) between May 2021 and July 2022; primary data collection was completed in August 2023. Outcomes included Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale SI/SB score at 6 months (primary) and 12 months (secondary). RESULTS: Adolescents (N=723; mean age, 14.9 years [SD=1.6]) were mostly female (75%), White (84.1%), and non-Hispanic (84.2%). Adults (N=797; mean age, 38.3 years [SD=15.9]) were mostly female (70%), White (89.1%), and non-Hispanic (90%). At 6 months, outcomes were similar by condition among adolescents, but among adults, SI/SB scores were significantly higher among those receiving CC compared to those receiving ISC (adjusted difference in means [ADM]=0.50, 95% CI=0.12, 0.88). At 12 months, adolescents' SI/SB scores were significantly lower in the CC compared with the ISC condition (ADM=-0.64, 95% CI=-1.11, -0.18), but outcomes were similar by condition among adults. CONCLUSIONS: The best suicide prevention follow-up care may vary by age, with adolescents benefiting most from longer-term connection-focused two-way CC and adults benefiting most from more intensive early instrumental support through ISC.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.