Skip to main content

Morphometric Analysis of Thigh Perforator Arteries Using CT Angiography: A Bilateral Comparative Study

Journal
Journal of clinical medicine (Q1)
Published
20 October 2026
Study design
Unclassified
Evidence level
Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
Authors
Hurriyet Cetinok, Ayhan Comert
PMID
42941640
DOI
10.3390/jcm15208127

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Anatomy (paper of the day, 29 October 2026): CTA quantifies bilateral thigh perforator anatomy and variability

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The thigh provides several perforator-based donor sites, but comparative computed tomography angiographic data describing anterolateral thigh (ALT), anteromedial thigh (AMT), and posteromedial thigh (PMT) perforators bilaterally remain limited. This study aimed to characterize CTA measurability, caliber, and side-to-side variability across these three territories. Methods: A total of 176 archived CTA records were screened. After predefined clinical/imaging exclusions and reconciliation of duplicated protocols, 49 unique patients with bilateral thigh imaging (98 lower limbs) were included. Patient-level measurable-perforator rates with 95% Wilson confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Side-to-side measurability was assessed with exact McNemar tests, territory differences with Cochran's Q tests, and paired diameters with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; Holm correction was applied within families of multiple comparisons. Results: PMT perforators were measurable in 75.5% of patients on each side (95% CI 61.9-85.4%), ALT in 51.0% on the left (37.5-64.4%) and 61.2% on the right (47.2-73.6%), and AMT in 24.5% on the left (14.6-38.1%) and 42.9% on the right (30.0-56.7%). Side-to-side measurability differed for AMT (exact McNemar p = 0.0117) but not ALT (p = 0.180) or PMT (p = 1.000). Paired ALT maximum diameter was 1.86 ± 0.27 mm on the left and 1.59 ± 0.42 mm on the right, but the bilateral difference was not statistically significant after Holm correction (adjusted p = 0.0588). No territory showed a statistically significant bilateral diameter difference after multiplicity correction, and overall maximum diameter did not differ among territories (p = 0.408). Among 17 patients with no measurable ALT perforator on either side, 15 (88.2%; 95% CI 65.7-96.7%) had a measurable AMT or PMT perforator. Conclusions: Archived CTA demonstrates substantial regional and bilateral variability in thigh perforator measurability. The three-territory comparison provides anatomical information that may inform individualized preoperative assessment, while the exploratory laterality findings require confirmation using standardized acquisition and reproducibility testing.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.