Skip to main content

Phase 3 randomized trial of latozinemab in frontotemporal dementia due to GRN mutations

Journal
Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association (Q1)
Published
1 October 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Adam Simmons, Bradley Boeve, Isabelle Le Ber, Barbara Borroni, Catherine Mummery, Jonathan D Rohrer, et al.
PMID
42934864
DOI
10.1002/alz.71947

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Neurology (clinical) (top studies of the week, 8 November 2026): Phase III trial tests disease-modifying therapy for genetic FTD

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Heterozygous progranulin gene mutations causing frontotemporal dementia (FTD-GRN) are associated with deficiency in progranulin (PGRN). Latozinemab is a human monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibody designed to elevate PGRN levels in people with heterozygous loss-of-function (LOF) GRN mutations. METHODS: A pivotal phase 3 trial, INFRONT-3 (NCT04374136), evaluated the efficacy, safety, and biomarker changes of 60 mg/kg of intravenously administered latozinemab or placebo every 4 weeks for 96 weeks in participants who have or are at risk for FTD due to heterozygous LOF GRN mutations. Those completing the double-blind phase could enter a 96-week open-label safety extension. RESULTS: Although latozinemab administration resulted in sustained elevation of plasma and CSF PGRN concentrations in symptomatic participants with FTD-GRN (primary analysis population), there was no treatment-related slowing of disease progression as measured by clinical or biomarker assessments. No adverse safety signals were identified. DISCUSSION: INFRONT-3 provides the first phase 3 efficacy and safety results for an investigational therapy in FTD-GRN.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.