Reaming-induced joint surface destruction in tibiotalocalcaneal nailing: a cadaveric comparison of straight and valgus-curved nails
In brief
Curved ankle-fusion nails doubled damage to two subtalar joint surfaces
In 20 cadaveric legs, reaming for valgus-curved nails destroyed 12% of the calcaneal facet and 15% of the talar facet, compared with 6% and 8% with straight nails. Damage stayed below 15%, with no significant differences at other joint surfaces; whether these anatomical findings affect patient outcomes remains unknown.
- Journal
- Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research (Q1)
- Published
- 28 July 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
- Authors
- Mahmut Kalem, Kamil Balaban, Malik Kısmet, Mehmet Yılmaz
- PMID
- 42919307
- DOI
- 10.1186/s13018-026-07136-0
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Anatomy (top studies of the week, 25 October 2026): Cadaveric comparison quantifies joint surface damage during nailing
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing has become an increasingly preferred option for the treatment of complex ankle pathologies and fragility fractures, particularly in geriatric patients. Despite its growing clinical use, limited data are available regarding how different nail designs impact joint surface integrity during intraoperative preparation. This cadaveric study aimed to compare the articular surface destruction caused by straight and valgus-curved TTC nails. METHODS: 20 fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs (mean age 70.1 ± 4.1 years) were randomized to receive either a straight or a valgus-curved TTC nail (n = 10 per group). All procedures were performed by a single experienced orthopedic surgeon without formal joint debridement. After reaming, four joint surfaces-calcaneal posterior facet (CPF), talar posterior facet (TPF), talar dome (TD), and tibial plafond (TP)-were dissected and digitally analyzed using ImageJ software to measure total and reamed areas. Joint destruction (%) and articular reaming (%) were calculated and compared between groups. RESULTS: Valgus-curved nails resulted in significantly greater joint destruction in CPF (12% vs. 6%, p = 0.018) and TPF (15% vs. 8%, p = 0.007) compared to straight nails. Articular reaming was also higher in the valgus-curved nails for both CPF (56% vs. 31%, p = 0.012) and TPF (79% vs. 43%, p = 0.004). No significant differences were found in TD or TP for either parameter (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Reaming for valgus-curved TTC nails yielded greater destruction of subtalar joint surfaces than straight nails, but the amount remained below 15%. These findings emphasize the impact of nail design on reaming-induced articular surface destruction during intraoperative preparation and provide quantitative anatomic data on the extent of joint surface involvement.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.