Skip to main content

Implications of the 2017 change in the French death certificate for the accuracy of mortality statistics worldwide

Journal
International journal of legal medicine (Q1)
Published
23 October 2026
Study design
Unclassified
Evidence level
Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
Authors
Melanie-Angela Neuilly, Frédéric Balusson, Renaud Bouvet
PMID
42918869
DOI
10.1007/s00414-026-04039-x

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differentiating between types of deaths is crucial because it allows us to better understand and prevent them, and it is essential to bringing justice to homicide victims. While there is extensive knowledge about the ways in which identifying manner of death can go wrong, the advocated solutions of more training and resources have not been put to the test. A peculiarity of the French death investigation system, along with a change in the French death certificate in 2017 allow us to test the efficacy of more specific instructions as a type of training as a solution to inaccurate information on types of deaths. METHODS: Using nationwide French death certificates information available through the Epidemiological Center on Causes of Death (CépiDC) from 2016 until 2019, we conducted a before-and-after natural experiment to establish whether the 2017 change impacted the quality of mortality statistics in France. We ran logistic regression models on the likelihood that a medicolegal investigation was conducted, as well as on the quality of ICD codes for causes of death. FINDINGS: The 2017 change in the French death certificate led to a two-fold increase in medicolegal investigations as well as an almost 10% increase in the quality of ICD codes of causes of death nationwide. INTERPRETATION: The more specific instructions provided through the changes to the French death certificate led to improved mortality statistics, thereby providing support for the hypothesis that more training increases the quality of mortality statistics. Future research should establish dose-response, as well as focusing on policy implications beyond the French context.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.